Vader Inquisitors vs Brampton Cows

Home · VADIVader Inquisitors

4–9Final

BCAwayBrampton Cows

Jul 8, 2026 · Central B · Mustafar Palace

MVP [HHRS] Saucy · 8.4 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Vader InquisitorsvsBrampton Cows

12Shots820

11Saves38

7Faceoffs won29

4Takeaways812

12Turnovers↓84

13Blocks922

41Passes4788

0:55Possession1:462:41

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Vader Inquisitors

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[VADE] Ghostwalker	2	0	2	5	1	2	1	1	5	3	15	0:16	56	5.07	4.22
[VAD] Filip Chytil Stan	1	1	2	4	6	3	4	1	5	4	12	0:12	93	6.50	6.08
[VAD] Galalendon	1	1	2	3	4	2	4	2	2	6	14	0:27	91	5.07	6.31

Brampton Cows

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[CLUD/HHRS] Tactical Miss	3	1	4	8	1	0	1	2	1	1	28	0:22	98	6.07	5.09
[HHRS] Saucy	3	2	5	5	7	2	3	4	2	11	31	1:06	181	5.42	8.63
[OCP/BRC] lacaaas	3	2	5	7	0	7	3	6	1	10	29	1:13	136	5.10	6.92

Ghostwalker Vader Inquisitors

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.92	1.8	0.23	0.044	0.01
Assists	0	1.49	1.55	0.19	-0.962	-0.183
Shots	5	4.07	2.81	0.09	0.33	0.03
Passes	15	16.79	7.91	0.08	-0.226	-0.018
Saves	1	2.15	2.57	0.19	-0.448	-0.085
Blocks	3	5.36	4.03	0.11	-0.586	-0.064
Takeaways	1	3.15	2.87	0.11	-0.748	-0.082

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.393 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.214, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.8

Pucker+56

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.311	0.604	0.32	0.193
Shots	5	4.071	1.228	0.08	0.098
Saves	1	2.15	0.465	0.15	0.07
Blocks	3	5.362	0.559	0.07	0.039
Takeaways	1	3.15	0.318	0.12	0.038
Passes	15	16.787	0.894	0.08	0.071
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.55 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.647 − 0.089 turnover penalty = 0.558 → ×100 = 55.84 → 56

Offensive5.07

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.125	0.099	0.4	2.809
Shooting %	0.4	0.472	0.2	1.079
Assists per pass	0	0.089	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.07

Defensive4.22

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.15	4.044	0.3	1.213
Blocks	3	5.362	4.344	0.2	0.869
Takeaways	1	3.15	3.627	0.25	0.907
Goals conceded	9	6.535	4.931	0.25	1.233

Σ contribution = 4.222

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Filip Chytil Stan Vader Inquisitors

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.92	1.8	0.23	-0.511	-0.118
Assists	1	1.49	1.55	0.19	-0.315	-0.06
Shots	4	4.07	2.81	0.09	-0.025	-0.002
Passes	12	16.79	7.91	0.08	-0.605	-0.048
Saves	6	2.15	2.57	0.19	1.5	0.285
Blocks	4	5.36	4.03	0.11	-0.338	-0.037
Takeaways	1	3.15	2.87	0.11	-0.748	-0.082

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.063 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.875, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.5

Pucker+93

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.311	0.604	0.32	0.193
Shots	4	4.071	0.983	0.08	0.079
Saves	6	2.15	2.791	0.15	0.419
Blocks	4	5.362	0.746	0.07	0.052
Takeaways	1	3.15	0.318	0.12	0.038
Passes	12	16.787	0.715	0.08	0.057
Faceoff win rate	0.429	0.5	0.857	0.03	0.026

Σ 0.864 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.016 − 0.089 turnover penalty = 0.927 → ×100 = 92.75 → 93

Offensive6.50

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.167	0.099	0.4	3.349
Shooting %	0.25	0.472	0.2	0.849
Assists per pass	0.083	0.089	0.4	2.304

Σ contribution = 6.502

Defensive6.08

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	6	2.15	9.784	0.3	2.935
Blocks	4	5.362	5.005	0.2	1.001
Takeaways	1	3.15	3.627	0.25	0.907
Goals conceded	9	6.535	4.931	0.25	1.233

Σ contribution = 6.076

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Galalendon Vader Inquisitors

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.92	1.8	0.23	-0.511	-0.118
Assists	1	1.49	1.55	0.19	-0.315	-0.06
Shots	3	4.07	2.81	0.09	-0.381	-0.034
Passes	14	16.79	7.91	0.08	-0.352	-0.028
Saves	4	2.15	2.57	0.19	0.721	0.137
Blocks	6	5.36	4.03	0.11	0.158	0.017
Takeaways	2	3.15	2.87	0.11	-0.4	-0.044

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.13 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.741, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.3

Pucker+91

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.311	0.604	0.32	0.193
Shots	3	4.071	0.737	0.08	0.059
Saves	4	2.15	1.861	0.15	0.279
Blocks	6	5.362	1.119	0.07	0.078
Takeaways	2	3.15	0.635	0.12	0.076
Passes	14	16.787	0.834	0.08	0.067
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.773 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.909 → ×100 = 90.9 → 91

Offensive5.07

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.074	0.099	0.4	2.005
Shooting %	0.333	0.472	0.2	0.972
Assists per pass	0.071	0.089	0.4	2.093

Σ contribution = 5.069

Defensive6.31

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.15	8.787	0.3	2.636
Blocks	6	5.362	6.474	0.2	1.295
Takeaways	2	3.15	4.602	0.25	1.15
Goals conceded	9	6.535	4.931	0.25	1.233

Σ contribution = 6.314

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Tactical Miss Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.92	1.8	0.23	0.599	0.138
Assists	1	1.49	1.55	0.19	-0.315	-0.06
Shots	8	4.07	2.81	0.09	1.397	0.126
Passes	28	16.79	7.91	0.08	1.418	0.113
Saves	1	2.15	2.57	0.19	-0.448	-0.085
Blocks	1	5.36	4.03	0.11	-1.082	-0.119
Takeaways	2	3.15	2.87	0.11	-0.4	-0.044

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.069 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.138, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.9

Pucker+98

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.311	1.208	0.32	0.387
Shots	8	4.071	1.965	0.08	0.157
Saves	1	2.15	0.465	0.15	0.07
Blocks	1	5.362	0.186	0.07	0.013
Takeaways	2	3.15	0.635	0.12	0.076
Passes	28	16.787	1.668	0.08	0.133
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.836 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.984 → ×100 = 98.38 → 98

Offensive6.07

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.182	0.099	0.4	3.493
Shooting %	0.375	0.472	0.2	1.038
Assists per pass	0.036	0.089	0.4	1.544

Σ contribution = 6.075

Defensive5.09

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.15	4.044	0.3	1.213
Blocks	1	5.362	3.314	0.2	0.663
Takeaways	2	3.15	4.602	0.25	1.15
Goals conceded	4	6.535	8.243	0.25	2.061

Σ contribution = 5.087

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Saucy Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.92	1.8	0.23	0.599	0.138
Assists	2	1.49	1.55	0.19	0.331	0.063
Shots	5	4.07	2.81	0.09	0.33	0.03
Passes	31	16.79	7.91	0.08	1.797	0.144
Saves	7	2.15	2.57	0.19	1.89	0.359
Blocks	11	5.36	4.03	0.11	1.398	0.154
Takeaways	4	3.15	2.87	0.11	0.296	0.033

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.919 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.839, then +0.35 saves, +0.25 hot shooting → 8.4

Pucker+181

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.311	1.51	0.32	0.483
Shots	5	4.071	1.228	0.08	0.098
Saves	7	2.15	3.256	0.15	0.488
Blocks	11	5.362	2.051	0.07	0.144
Takeaways	4	3.15	1.27	0.12	0.152
Passes	31	16.787	1.847	0.08	0.148
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 1.538 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.809 → ×100 = 180.9 → 181

Offensive5.42

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.076	0.099	0.4	2.03
Shooting %	0.6	0.472	0.2	1.412
Assists per pass	0.065	0.089	0.4	1.975

Σ contribution = 5.417

Defensive8.63

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	7	2.15	9.913	0.3	2.974
Blocks	11	5.362	9.129	0.2	1.826
Takeaways	4	3.15	7.054	0.25	1.764
Goals conceded	4	6.535	8.243	0.25	2.061

Σ contribution = 8.625

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

lacaaas Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.92	1.8	0.23	0.599	0.138
Assists	2	1.49	1.55	0.19	0.331	0.063
Shots	7	4.07	2.81	0.09	1.042	0.094
Passes	29	16.79	7.91	0.08	1.544	0.124
Saves	0	2.15	2.57	0.19	-0.837	-0.159
Blocks	10	5.36	4.03	0.11	1.15	0.126
Takeaways	6	3.15	2.87	0.11	0.992	0.109

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.494 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.989, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 7.0

Pucker+136

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.311	1.51	0.32	0.483
Shots	7	4.071	1.72	0.08	0.138
Saves	0	2.15	0	0.15	0
Blocks	10	5.362	1.865	0.07	0.131
Takeaways	6	3.15	1.905	0.12	0.229
Passes	29	16.787	1.727	0.08	0.138
Faceoff win rate	0.7	0.5	1.4	0.03	0.042

Σ 1.16 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.365 → ×100 = 136.49 → 136

Offensive5.10

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.068	0.099	0.4	1.921
Shooting %	0.429	0.472	0.2	1.127
Assists per pass	0.069	0.089	0.4	2.05

Σ contribution = 5.098

Defensive6.92

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.15	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	10	5.362	8.795	0.2	1.759
Takeaways	6	3.15	8.875	0.25	2.219
Goals conceded	4	6.535	8.243	0.25	2.061

Σ contribution = 6.925

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.