Tuxedo Monkeys vs Brampton Cows

TMHomeTuxedo Monkeys

13–6Final

BCAwayBrampton Cows

Feb 24, 2026 · B Bowl - Playoffs · Tailor Place

MVP [TUX] Nano · 8.7 performance rating

Writing the recap…

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Tuxedo Monkeys

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[CHA/BOIS] PoppaNut	4	3	7	6	3	2	8	4	6	6	28	0:34	124	7.00	6.76
[CHA] Square	5	2	7	11	1	1	4	4	6	4	25	0:24	115	6.81	5.64
[TUX] Nano	4	3	7	5	10	3	4	3	11	16	21	0:25	149	8.09	8.17

Brampton Cows

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[CLUD/HHRS] Tactical Miss	2	1	3	10	1	3	0	3	4	4	29	0:28	90	4.35	4.66
[HHRS] Saucy	2	3	5	5	2	9	3	15	4	5	25	1:21	152	5.10	6.23
[OCP/BRC] lacaaas	2	2	4	5	6	4	3	5	3	15	27	0:59	149	4.58	7.92

PoppaNut Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.33	2.1	0.23	0.797	0.183
Assists	3	2.11	1.81	0.19	0.494	0.094
Shots	6	4.85	3.56	0.09	0.324	0.029
Passes	28	17.47	7.15	0.08	1.473	0.118
Saves	3	2.52	2.97	0.19	0.161	0.031
Blocks	6	6.07	4.28	0.11	-0.017	-0.002
Takeaways	4	3.14	3.04	0.11	0.284	0.031

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.484 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.968, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 6.9

Pucker+124

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7	4.236	1.653	0.32	0.529
Shots	6	4.846	1.238	0.08	0.099
Saves	3	2.52	1.19	0.15	0.179
Blocks	6	6.073	0.988	0.07	0.069
Takeaways	4	3.138	1.275	0.12	0.153
Passes	28	17.472	1.603	0.08	0.128
Faceoff win rate	0.2	0.5	0.4	0.03	0.012

Σ 1.169 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.375 − 0.139 turnover penalty = 1.236 → ×100 = 123.6 → 124

Offensive7.00

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.206	0.128	0.4	3.275
Shooting %	0.667	0.48	0.2	1.497
Assists per pass	0.107	0.121	0.4	2.223

Σ contribution = 6.995

Defensive6.76

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.52	6.752	0.3	2.026
Blocks	6	6.073	5.952	0.2	1.19
Takeaways	4	3.138	7.072	0.25	1.768
Goals conceded	6	7.732	7.123	0.25	1.781

Σ contribution = 6.765

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Square Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.33	2.1	0.23	1.273	0.293
Assists	2	2.11	1.81	0.19	-0.058	-0.011
Shots	11	4.85	3.56	0.09	1.728	0.155
Passes	25	17.47	7.15	0.08	1.053	0.084
Saves	1	2.52	2.97	0.19	-0.512	-0.097
Blocks	4	6.07	4.28	0.11	-0.485	-0.053
Takeaways	4	3.14	3.04	0.11	0.284	0.031

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.402 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.804, then −0.3 turnovers → 6.5

Pucker+115

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7	4.236	1.653	0.32	0.529
Shots	11	4.846	2.27	0.08	0.182
Saves	1	2.52	0.397	0.15	0.06
Blocks	4	6.073	0.659	0.07	0.046
Takeaways	4	3.138	1.275	0.12	0.153
Passes	25	17.472	1.431	0.08	0.114
Faceoff win rate	0.2	0.5	0.4	0.03	0.012

Σ 1.095 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.289 − 0.139 turnover penalty = 1.15 → ×100 = 114.98 → 115

Offensive6.81

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.292	0.128	0.4	3.773
Shooting %	0.455	0.48	0.2	1.158
Assists per pass	0.08	0.121	0.4	1.881

Σ contribution = 6.813

Defensive5.64

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.52	3.843	0.3	1.153
Blocks	4	6.073	4.685	0.2	0.937
Takeaways	4	3.138	7.072	0.25	1.768
Goals conceded	6	7.732	7.123	0.25	1.781

Σ contribution = 5.639

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Nano Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.33	2.1	0.23	0.797	0.183
Assists	3	2.11	1.81	0.19	0.494	0.094
Shots	5	4.85	3.56	0.09	0.043	0.004
Passes	21	17.47	7.15	0.08	0.494	0.039
Saves	10	2.52	2.97	0.19	2.518	0.478
Blocks	16	6.07	4.28	0.11	2.322	0.255
Takeaways	3	3.14	3.04	0.11	-0.046	-0.005

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.049 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.099, then +0.35 saves, +0.3 blocks, +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 8.7

Pucker+149

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6.5	4.236	1.535	0.32	0.491
Shots	5	4.846	1.032	0.08	0.083
Saves	10	2.52	3.968	0.15	0.595
Blocks	16	6.073	2.635	0.07	0.184
Takeaways	3	3.138	0.956	0.12	0.115
Passes	21	17.472	1.202	0.08	0.096
Faceoff win rate	0.429	0.5	0.857	0.03	0.026

Σ 1.59 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.87 − 0.38 turnover penalty = 1.49 → ×100 = 149.04 → 149

Offensive8.09

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.28	0.128	0.4	3.732
Shooting %	0.8	0.48	0.2	1.667
Assists per pass	0.143	0.121	0.4	2.693

Σ contribution = 8.091

Defensive8.17

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	10	2.52	9.979	0.3	2.994
Blocks	16	6.073	9.707	0.2	1.941
Takeaways	3	3.138	5.824	0.25	1.456
Goals conceded	6	7.732	7.123	0.25	1.781

Σ contribution = 8.172

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Tactical Miss Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.33	2.1	0.23	-0.155	-0.036
Assists	1	2.11	1.81	0.19	-0.611	-0.116
Shots	10	4.85	3.56	0.09	1.447	0.13
Passes	29	17.47	7.15	0.08	1.612	0.129
Saves	1	2.52	2.97	0.19	-0.512	-0.097
Blocks	4	6.07	4.28	0.11	-0.485	-0.053
Takeaways	3	3.14	3.04	0.11	-0.046	-0.005

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.048 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.904, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.5

Pucker+90

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	4.236	0.708	0.32	0.227
Shots	10	4.846	2.064	0.08	0.165
Saves	1	2.52	0.397	0.15	0.06
Blocks	4	6.073	0.659	0.07	0.046
Takeaways	3	3.138	0.956	0.12	0.115
Passes	29	17.472	1.66	0.08	0.133
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.805 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.947 − 0.043 turnover penalty = 0.904 → ×100 = 90.42 → 90

Offensive4.35

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.107	0.128	0.4	2.146
Shooting %	0.2	0.48	0.2	0.78
Assists per pass	0.034	0.121	0.4	1.419

Σ contribution = 4.345

Defensive4.66

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.52	3.843	0.3	1.153
Blocks	4	6.073	4.685	0.2	0.937
Takeaways	3	3.138	5.824	0.25	1.456
Goals conceded	13	7.732	4.462	0.25	1.116

Σ contribution = 4.662

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Saucy Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.33	2.1	0.23	-0.155	-0.036
Assists	3	2.11	1.81	0.19	0.494	0.094
Shots	5	4.85	3.56	0.09	0.043	0.004
Passes	25	17.47	7.15	0.08	1.053	0.084
Saves	2	2.52	2.97	0.19	-0.175	-0.033
Blocks	5	6.07	4.28	0.11	-0.251	-0.028
Takeaways	15	3.14	3.04	0.11	3.907	0.43

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.515 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.031, then +0.3 takeaways, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.9

Pucker+152

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4.5	4.236	1.062	0.32	0.34
Shots	5	4.846	1.032	0.08	0.083
Saves	2	2.52	0.794	0.15	0.119
Blocks	5	6.073	0.823	0.07	0.058
Takeaways	15	3.138	4.78	0.12	0.574
Passes	25	17.472	1.431	0.08	0.114
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 1.332 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.567 − 0.043 turnover penalty = 1.524 → ×100 = 152.46 → 152

Offensive5.10

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.062	0.128	0.4	1.641
Shooting %	0.4	0.48	0.2	1.068
Assists per pass	0.12	0.121	0.4	2.393

Σ contribution = 5.102

Defensive6.23

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.52	5.186	0.3	1.556
Blocks	5	6.073	5.3	0.2	1.06
Takeaways	15	3.138	9.996	0.25	2.499
Goals conceded	13	7.732	4.462	0.25	1.116

Σ contribution = 6.231

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

lacaaas Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.33	2.1	0.23	-0.155	-0.036
Assists	2	2.11	1.81	0.19	-0.058	-0.011
Shots	5	4.85	3.56	0.09	0.043	0.004
Passes	27	17.47	7.15	0.08	1.333	0.107
Saves	6	2.52	2.97	0.19	1.171	0.223
Blocks	15	6.07	4.28	0.11	2.088	0.23
Takeaways	5	3.14	3.04	0.11	0.613	0.067

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.583 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.167, then +0.3 blocks, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 7.1

Pucker+149

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	4.236	0.944	0.32	0.302
Shots	5	4.846	1.032	0.08	0.083
Saves	6	2.52	2.381	0.15	0.357
Blocks	15	6.073	2.47	0.07	0.173
Takeaways	5	3.138	1.593	0.12	0.191
Passes	27	17.472	1.545	0.08	0.124
Faceoff win rate	0.571	0.5	1.143	0.03	0.034

Σ 1.264 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.487 → ×100 = 148.69 → 149

Offensive4.58

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.068	0.128	0.4	1.701
Shooting %	0.4	0.48	0.2	1.068
Assists per pass	0.074	0.121	0.4	1.812

Σ contribution = 4.581

Defensive7.92

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	6	2.52	9.524	0.3	2.857
Blocks	15	6.073	9.598	0.2	1.92
Takeaways	5	3.138	8.129	0.25	2.032
Goals conceded	13	7.732	4.462	0.25	1.116

Σ contribution = 7.925

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.