Vader Inquisitors vs Brampton Cows

Home · VADIVader Inquisitors

5–4Final

BCAwayBrampton Cows

Feb 4, 2026 · Central B - East vs South · Mustafar Palace

MVP [OCP/BRC] lacaaas · 7.4 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Perf is a 0 to 10 Alto rating, 6.0 being league average. Click any Perf number to see the working behind it.

Vader Inquisitors

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[VADD] Meenimizer	1	3	4	3	4	1	2	10	7	9	16	0	0:33	144	7.87	8.56
[VADE] Ghostwalker	4	1	5	6	0	0	4	1	5	4	30	1	0:18	99	7.09	4.59
[VAD] Galalendon	0	2	2	0	8	1	3	2	4	10	15	0	0:47	116	5.53	7.67

Brampton Cows

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[CLUD/HHRS] Tactical Miss	2	2	4	7	1	3	1	3	6	7	32	1:08	112	4.89	5.62
[OCP/BRC] lacaaas	0	3	3	4	2	3	0	10	4	14	28	0:58	143	5.27	7.71
[OMG] LIT	2	0	2	5	1	3	1	3	3	12	16	0:30	92	4.41	6.10

Meenimizer Vader Inquisitors

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance6.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.64	1.52	0.23	-0.419	-0.096
Assists	3	1.34	1.19	0.19	1.398	0.266
Shots	3	3.73	2.78	0.09	-0.264	-0.024
Passes	16	16.09	7.24	0.08	-0.012	-0.001
Saves	4	2.1	2.32	0.19	0.821	0.156
Blocks	9	6.14	4.08	0.11	0.702	0.077
Takeaways	10	3.07	2.82	0.11	2.458	0.27

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.648 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.296, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.8

Pucker+144

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	2.867	1.395	0.32	0.446
Shots	3	3.734	0.803	0.08	0.064
Saves	4	2.096	1.909	0.15	0.286
Blocks	9	6.138	1.466	0.07	0.103
Takeaways	10	3.074	3.253	0.12	0.39
Passes	16	16.085	0.995	0.08	0.08
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 1.39 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.635 − 0.192 turnover penalty = 1.443 → ×100 = 144.32 → 144

Offensive7.87

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.121	0.082	0.4	3.102
Shooting %	0.333	0.439	0.2	1.011
Assists per pass	0.188	0.083	0.4	3.757

Σ contribution = 7.871

Defensive8.56

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.096	8.882	0.3	2.665
Blocks	9	6.138	7.741	0.2	1.548
Takeaways	10	3.074	9.913	0.25	2.478
Goals conceded	4	5.532	7.461	0.25	1.865

Σ contribution = 8.556

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Ghostwalker Vader Inquisitors

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance6.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.64	1.52	0.23	1.551	0.357
Assists	1	1.34	1.19	0.19	-0.287	-0.054
Shots	6	3.73	2.78	0.09	0.816	0.073
Passes	30	16.09	7.24	0.08	1.922	0.154
Saves	0	2.1	2.32	0.19	-0.904	-0.172
Blocks	4	6.14	4.08	0.11	-0.525	-0.058
Takeaways	1	3.07	2.82	0.11	-0.736	-0.081

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.219 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.438, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.7

Pucker+99

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	2.867	1.744	0.32	0.558
Shots	6	3.734	1.607	0.08	0.129
Saves	0	2.096	0	0.15	0
Blocks	4	6.138	0.652	0.07	0.046
Takeaways	1	3.074	0.325	0.12	0.039
Passes	30	16.085	1.865	0.08	0.149
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.92 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.083 − 0.094 turnover penalty = 0.989 → ×100 = 98.9 → 99

Offensive7.09

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.278	0.082	0.4	3.972
Shooting %	0.667	0.439	0.2	1.582
Assists per pass	0.033	0.083	0.4	1.541

Σ contribution = 7.095

Defensive4.59

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.096	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	4	6.138	4.66	0.2	0.932
Takeaways	1	3.074	3.648	0.25	0.912
Goals conceded	4	5.532	7.461	0.25	1.865

Σ contribution = 4.595

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Galalendon Vader Inquisitors

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.64	1.52	0.23	-1.076	-0.247
Assists	2	1.34	1.19	0.19	0.556	0.106
Shots	0	3.73	2.78	0.09	-1.345	-0.121
Passes	15	16.09	7.24	0.08	-0.15	-0.012
Saves	8	2.1	2.32	0.19	2.546	0.484
Blocks	10	6.14	4.08	0.11	0.947	0.104
Takeaways	2	3.07	2.82	0.11	-0.381	-0.042

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.271 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.542, then +0.35 saves → 6.9

Pucker+116

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1.5	2.867	0.523	0.32	0.167
Shots	0	3.734	0	0.08	0
Saves	8	2.096	3.817	0.15	0.573
Blocks	10	6.138	1.629	0.07	0.114
Takeaways	2	3.074	0.651	0.12	0.078
Passes	15	16.085	0.933	0.08	0.075
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 1.022 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.202 − 0.045 turnover penalty = 1.157 → ×100 = 115.69 → 116

Offensive5.53

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.043	0.082	0.4	1.681
Shooting %	0	0.439	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.133	0.083	0.4	3.259

Σ contribution = 5.531

Defensive7.67

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	8	2.096	9.972	0.3	2.991
Blocks	10	6.138	8.23	0.2	1.646
Takeaways	2	3.074	4.656	0.25	1.164
Goals conceded	4	5.532	7.461	0.25	1.865

Σ contribution = 7.666

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Tactical Miss Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.64	1.52	0.23	0.238	0.055
Assists	2	1.34	1.19	0.19	0.556	0.106
Shots	7	3.73	2.78	0.09	1.177	0.106
Passes	32	16.09	7.24	0.08	2.199	0.176
Saves	1	2.1	2.32	0.19	-0.473	-0.09
Blocks	7	6.14	4.08	0.11	0.211	0.023
Takeaways	3	3.07	2.82	0.11	-0.026	-0.003

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.373 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.745, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.2

Pucker+112

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	2.867	1.395	0.32	0.446
Shots	7	3.734	1.875	0.08	0.15
Saves	1	2.096	0.477	0.15	0.072
Blocks	7	6.138	1.14	0.07	0.08
Takeaways	3	3.074	0.976	0.12	0.117
Passes	32	16.085	1.989	0.08	0.159
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 1.069 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.258 − 0.143 turnover penalty = 1.115 → ×100 = 111.5 → 112

Offensive4.89

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.059	0.082	0.4	1.954
Shooting %	0.286	0.439	0.2	0.932
Assists per pass	0.062	0.083	0.4	2.008

Σ contribution = 4.894

Defensive5.62

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.096	4.08	0.3	1.224
Blocks	7	6.138	6.558	0.2	1.312
Takeaways	3	3.074	5.903	0.25	1.476
Goals conceded	5	5.532	6.424	0.25	1.606

Σ contribution = 5.618

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

lacaaas Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance7.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.64	1.52	0.23	-1.076	-0.247
Assists	3	1.34	1.19	0.19	1.398	0.266
Shots	4	3.73	2.78	0.09	0.096	0.009
Passes	28	16.09	7.24	0.08	1.646	0.132
Saves	2	2.1	2.32	0.19	-0.041	-0.008
Blocks	14	6.14	4.08	0.11	1.929	0.212
Takeaways	10	3.07	2.82	0.11	2.458	0.27

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.633 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.266, then +0.3 blocks, −0.2 cold shooting → 7.4

Pucker+143

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2.5	2.867	0.872	0.32	0.279
Shots	4	3.734	1.071	0.08	0.086
Saves	2	2.096	0.954	0.15	0.143
Blocks	14	6.138	2.281	0.07	0.16
Takeaways	10	3.074	3.253	0.12	0.39
Passes	28	16.085	1.741	0.08	0.139
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 1.257 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.479 − 0.045 turnover penalty = 1.434 → ×100 = 143.38 → 143

Offensive5.27

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.052	0.082	0.4	1.83
Shooting %	0	0.439	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.107	0.083	0.4	2.845

Σ contribution = 5.266

Defensive7.71

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.096	5.817	0.3	1.745
Blocks	14	6.138	9.427	0.2	1.885
Takeaways	10	3.074	9.913	0.25	2.478
Goals conceded	5	5.532	6.424	0.25	1.606

Σ contribution = 7.714

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

LIT Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.64	1.52	0.23	0.238	0.055
Assists	0	1.34	1.19	0.19	-1.129	-0.214
Shots	5	3.73	2.78	0.09	0.456	0.041
Passes	16	16.09	7.24	0.08	-0.012	-0.001
Saves	1	2.1	2.32	0.19	-0.473	-0.09
Blocks	12	6.14	4.08	0.11	1.438	0.158
Takeaways	3	3.07	2.82	0.11	-0.026	-0.003

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.054 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.891, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.7

Pucker+92

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	2.867	0.698	0.32	0.223
Shots	5	3.734	1.339	0.08	0.107
Saves	1	2.096	0.477	0.15	0.072
Blocks	12	6.138	1.955	0.07	0.137
Takeaways	3	3.074	0.976	0.12	0.117
Passes	16	16.085	0.995	0.08	0.08
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.78 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.918 → ×100 = 91.82 → 92

Offensive4.41

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.067	0.082	0.4	2.098
Shooting %	0.4	0.439	0.2	1.129
Assists per pass	0	0.083	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.409

Defensive6.10

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.096	4.08	0.3	1.224
Blocks	12	6.138	8.968	0.2	1.794
Takeaways	3	3.074	5.903	0.25	1.476
Goals conceded	5	5.532	6.424	0.25	1.606

Σ contribution = 6.1

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.