Ottawa Valley Geriatric Slappers vs Good Better Best

Home · OVGSOttawa Valley Geriatric Slappers

11–5Final

GBAwayGood Better Best

Jan 12, 2026 · Central B - South · Green Grove Retirement Community

MVP [DDS] LessThanDennis · 8.7 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Ottawa Valley Geriatric SlappersvsGood Better Best

17Shots611

6Saves6

14Faceoffs won104

6Takeaways39

9Turnovers↓36

14Blocks1024

86Passes4838

1:52Possession0:361:16

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Ottawa Valley Geriatric Slappers

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[CTH/NNN] Noob_Weapons	2	7	9	2	1	5	1	2	4	9	27	0:42	155	9.28	5.85
[DDS] LessThanDennis	7	2	9	11	3	3	2	4	3	3	28	0:47	199	6.78	6.94
[KGF] GiraffeKiller	2	3	5	4	2	6	1	0	2	2	31	0:23	102	7.10	5.10

Good Better Best

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[GBB] Mumen Rider	2	1	3	4	0	2	5	2	0	6	12	0:08	72	7.21	4.45
[GBB] mattyb30	3	1	4	5	3	1	2	5	5	11	16	0:56	130	5.03	7.57
[GBB] mattyb69	0	0	0	2	3	1	7	2	1	7	10	0:12	63	2.95	6.25

Noob_Weapons Ottawa Valley Geriatric Slappers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.77	2.16	0.23	0.105	0.024
Assists	7	1.8	1.92	0.19	2.702	0.513
Shots	2	3.52	3.09	0.09	-0.49	-0.044
Passes	27	16.62	8.99	0.08	1.155	0.092
Saves	1	1.74	2.12	0.19	-0.35	-0.066
Blocks	9	5.33	3.99	0.11	0.92	0.101
Takeaways	2	2.82	2.87	0.11	-0.286	-0.031

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.589 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.178, then +0.4 playmaker, +0.25 hot shooting → 7.8

Pucker+155

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	9	3.364	2.676	0.32	0.856
Shots	2	3.515	0.569	0.08	0.046
Saves	1	1.742	0.574	0.15	0.086
Blocks	9	5.333	1.688	0.07	0.118
Takeaways	2	2.818	0.71	0.12	0.085
Passes	27	16.621	1.624	0.08	0.13
Faceoff win rate	0.833	0.5	1.667	0.03	0.05

Σ 1.371 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.613 − 0.065 turnover penalty = 1.548 → ×100 = 154.78 → 155

Offensive9.28

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.214	0.104	0.4	3.659
Shooting %	1	0.504	0.2	1.804
Assists per pass	0.259	0.108	0.4	3.813

Σ contribution = 9.276

Defensive5.85

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.742	4.392	0.3	1.318
Blocks	9	5.333	8.385	0.2	1.677
Takeaways	2	2.818	4.87	0.25	1.218
Goals conceded	5	5.667	6.53	0.25	1.633

Σ contribution = 5.846

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

LessThanDennis Ottawa Valley Geriatric Slappers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	7	1.77	2.16	0.23	2.419	0.556
Assists	2	1.8	1.92	0.19	0.102	0.019
Shots	11	3.52	3.09	0.09	2.423	0.218
Passes	28	16.62	8.99	0.08	1.266	0.101
Saves	3	1.74	2.12	0.19	0.593	0.113
Blocks	3	5.33	3.99	0.11	-0.585	-0.064
Takeaways	4	2.82	2.87	0.11	0.412	0.045

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.989 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.977, then +0.5 hat trick, +0.25 hot shooting → 8.7

Pucker+199

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	8.5	3.364	2.527	0.32	0.809
Shots	11	3.515	3.129	0.08	0.25
Saves	3	1.742	1.722	0.15	0.258
Blocks	3	5.333	0.562	0.07	0.039
Takeaways	4	2.818	1.419	0.12	0.17
Passes	28	16.621	1.685	0.08	0.135
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 1.698 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.997 − 0.011 turnover penalty = 1.986 → ×100 = 198.59 → 199

Offensive6.78

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.191	0.104	0.4	3.501
Shooting %	0.636	0.504	0.2	1.405
Assists per pass	0.071	0.108	0.4	1.874

Σ contribution = 6.78

Defensive6.94

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	1.742	8.472	0.3	2.542
Blocks	3	5.333	4.354	0.2	0.871
Takeaways	4	2.818	7.586	0.25	1.896
Goals conceded	5	5.667	6.53	0.25	1.633

Σ contribution = 6.942

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

GiraffeKiller Ottawa Valley Geriatric Slappers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.77	2.16	0.23	0.105	0.024
Assists	3	1.8	1.92	0.19	0.622	0.118
Shots	4	3.52	3.09	0.09	0.157	0.014
Passes	31	16.62	8.99	0.08	1.6	0.128
Saves	2	1.74	2.12	0.19	0.121	0.023
Blocks	2	5.33	3.99	0.11	-0.836	-0.092
Takeaways	0	2.82	2.87	0.11	-0.983	-0.108

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.107 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.215, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.2

Pucker+102

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.364	1.189	0.32	0.381
Shots	4	3.515	1.138	0.08	0.091
Saves	2	1.742	1.148	0.15	0.172
Blocks	2	5.333	0.375	0.07	0.026
Takeaways	0	2.818	0	0.12	0
Passes	31	16.621	1.865	0.08	0.149
Faceoff win rate	0.857	0.5	1.714	0.03	0.051

Σ 0.871 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.024 → ×100 = 102.43 → 102

Offensive7.10

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.217	0.104	0.4	3.677
Shooting %	0.5	0.504	0.2	1.193
Assists per pass	0.097	0.108	0.4	2.228

Σ contribution = 7.098

Defensive5.10

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	1.742	6.587	0.3	1.976
Blocks	2	5.333	3.782	0.2	0.756
Takeaways	0	2.818	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	5	5.667	6.53	0.25	1.633

Σ contribution = 5.103

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Mumen Rider Good Better Best

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.77	2.16	0.23	0.105	0.024
Assists	1	1.8	1.92	0.19	-0.418	-0.079
Shots	4	3.52	3.09	0.09	0.157	0.014
Passes	12	16.62	8.99	0.08	-0.514	-0.041
Saves	0	1.74	2.12	0.19	-0.821	-0.156
Blocks	6	5.33	3.99	0.11	0.167	0.018
Takeaways	2	2.82	2.87	0.11	-0.286	-0.031

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.251 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.498, then −0.2 goals against → 5.3

Pucker+72

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.364	0.892	0.32	0.285
Shots	4	3.515	1.138	0.08	0.091
Saves	0	1.742	0	0.15	0
Blocks	6	5.333	1.125	0.07	0.079
Takeaways	2	2.818	0.71	0.12	0.085
Passes	12	16.621	0.722	0.08	0.058
Faceoff win rate	0.286	0.5	0.571	0.03	0.017

Σ 0.615 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.724 → ×100 = 72.38 → 72

Offensive7.21

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.375	0.104	0.4	3.983
Shooting %	0.5	0.504	0.2	1.193
Assists per pass	0.083	0.108	0.4	2.036

Σ contribution = 7.212

Defensive4.45

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.742	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	6	5.333	6.497	0.2	1.299
Takeaways	2	2.818	4.87	0.25	1.218
Goals conceded	11	5.667	4.2	0.25	1.05

Σ contribution = 4.453

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

mattyb30 Good Better Best

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.77	2.16	0.23	0.568	0.131
Assists	1	1.8	1.92	0.19	-0.418	-0.079
Shots	5	3.52	3.09	0.09	0.481	0.043
Passes	16	16.62	8.99	0.08	-0.069	-0.006
Saves	3	1.74	2.12	0.19	0.593	0.113
Blocks	11	5.33	3.99	0.11	1.422	0.156
Takeaways	5	2.82	2.87	0.11	0.761	0.084

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.442 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.884, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.9

Pucker+130

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.364	1.189	0.32	0.381
Shots	5	3.515	1.422	0.08	0.114
Saves	3	1.742	1.722	0.15	0.258
Blocks	11	5.333	2.062	0.07	0.144
Takeaways	5	2.818	1.774	0.12	0.213
Passes	16	16.621	0.963	0.08	0.077
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 1.207 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.42 − 0.119 turnover penalty = 1.301 → ×100 = 130.08 → 130

Offensive5.03

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.071	0.104	0.4	1.916
Shooting %	0.6	0.504	0.2	1.35
Assists per pass	0.062	0.108	0.4	1.76

Σ contribution = 5.026

Defensive7.57

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	1.742	8.472	0.3	2.542
Blocks	11	5.333	9.146	0.2	1.829
Takeaways	5	2.818	8.597	0.25	2.149
Goals conceded	11	5.667	4.2	0.25	1.05

Σ contribution = 7.57

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

mattyb69 Good Better Best

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.77	2.16	0.23	-0.82	-0.189
Assists	0	1.8	1.92	0.19	-0.937	-0.178
Shots	2	3.52	3.09	0.09	-0.49	-0.044
Passes	10	16.62	8.99	0.08	-0.737	-0.059
Saves	3	1.74	2.12	0.19	0.593	0.113
Blocks	7	5.33	3.99	0.11	0.418	0.046
Takeaways	2	2.82	2.87	0.11	-0.286	-0.031

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.343 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.315, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.9

Pucker+63

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.364	0	0.32	0
Shots	2	3.515	0.569	0.08	0.046
Saves	3	1.742	1.722	0.15	0.258
Blocks	7	5.333	1.312	0.07	0.092
Takeaways	2	2.818	0.71	0.12	0.085
Passes	10	16.621	0.602	0.08	0.048
Faceoff win rate	0.125	0.5	0.25	0.03	0.007

Σ 0.536 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.631 → ×100 = 63.11 → 63

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.104	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.504	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.108	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive6.25

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	1.742	8.472	0.3	2.542
Blocks	7	5.333	7.211	0.2	1.442
Takeaways	2	2.818	4.87	0.25	1.218
Goals conceded	11	5.667	4.2	0.25	1.05

Σ contribution = 6.252

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.