New Jersey Dragons vs Champaign Champagne

NJHomeNew Jersey Dragons

9–3Final

Away · CHAChampaign Champagne

Jun 30, 2025 · Pro Division · The Nest

MVP Richard Tantrum · 6.6 performance rating

Writing the recap…

New Jersey DragonsvsChampaign Champagne

24Shots204

1Saves1415

6Faceoffs won28

12Takeaways210

10Turnovers↓212

12Blocks1527

103Passes5548

2:32Possession1:171:15

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

New Jersey Dragons

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Lucki	3	4	7	8	0	2	2	5	0	3	26	0:29	111	7.90	5.78
9th coming of Jesus	3	2	5	8	1	3	0	3	7	2	40	0:43	89	5.18	5.40
Mace	3	3	6	8	0	1	6	4	3	7	37	1:20	112	5.02	6.07

Champaign Champagne

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Richard Tantrum	0	1	1	0	9	3	2	3	4	17	14	0:45	112	3.84	7.51
Square	1	1	2	2	5	2	3	4	3	7	18	0:16	89	5.59	6.81
axe	2	1	3	2	1	3	1	3	5	3	16	0:14	61	7.23	4.54

Lucki New Jersey Dragons

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.26	2.04	0.23	0.363	0.083
Assists	4	2.16	1.91	0.19	0.968	0.184
Shots	8	5.05	3.76	0.09	0.785	0.071
Passes	26	20.7	8.67	0.08	0.611	0.049
Saves	0	2.79	3.55	0.19	-0.785	-0.149
Blocks	3	5.59	4.09	0.11	-0.634	-0.07
Takeaways	5	3.89	2.93	0.11	0.378	0.042

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.209 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.418, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.2

Pucker+111

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6.5	4.175	1.557	0.32	0.498
Shots	8	5.052	1.584	0.08	0.127
Saves	0	2.791	0	0.15	0
Blocks	3	5.594	0.536	0.07	0.038
Takeaways	5	3.894	1.284	0.12	0.154
Passes	26	20.699	1.256	0.08	0.1
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.947 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.114 → ×100 = 111.4 → 111

Offensive7.90

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.241	0.111	0.4	3.719
Shooting %	0.375	0.448	0.2	1.071
Assists per pass	0.154	0.104	0.4	3.111

Σ contribution = 7.901

Defensive5.78

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.791	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	3	5.594	4.268	0.2	0.854
Takeaways	5	3.894	7.106	0.25	1.776
Goals conceded	3	7.136	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.778

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

9th coming of Jesus New Jersey Dragons

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.26	2.04	0.23	0.363	0.083
Assists	2	2.16	1.91	0.19	-0.082	-0.016
Shots	8	5.05	3.76	0.09	0.785	0.071
Passes	40	20.7	8.67	0.08	2.225	0.178
Saves	1	2.79	3.55	0.19	-0.504	-0.096
Blocks	2	5.59	4.09	0.11	-0.879	-0.097
Takeaways	3	3.89	2.93	0.11	-0.305	-0.034

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.09 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.181, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 5.7

Pucker+89

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4.5	4.175	1.078	0.32	0.345
Shots	8	5.052	1.584	0.08	0.127
Saves	1	2.791	0.358	0.15	0.054
Blocks	2	5.594	0.358	0.07	0.025
Takeaways	3	3.894	0.77	0.12	0.092
Passes	40	20.699	1.932	0.08	0.155
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	1.999	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.857 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.009 − 0.121 turnover penalty = 0.888 → ×100 = 88.8 → 89

Offensive5.18

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.116	0.111	0.4	2.472
Shooting %	0.375	0.448	0.2	1.071
Assists per pass	0.05	0.104	0.4	1.636

Σ contribution = 5.179

Defensive5.40

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.791	3.736	0.3	1.121
Blocks	2	5.594	3.734	0.2	0.747
Takeaways	3	3.894	5.097	0.25	1.274
Goals conceded	3	7.136	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.404

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Mace New Jersey Dragons

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.26	2.04	0.23	0.363	0.083
Assists	3	2.16	1.91	0.19	0.443	0.084
Shots	8	5.05	3.76	0.09	0.785	0.071
Passes	37	20.7	8.67	0.08	1.879	0.15
Saves	0	2.79	3.55	0.19	-0.785	-0.149
Blocks	7	5.59	4.09	0.11	0.344	0.038
Takeaways	4	3.89	2.93	0.11	0.036	0.004

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.281 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.562, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.4

Pucker+112

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	4.175	1.437	0.32	0.46
Shots	8	5.052	1.584	0.08	0.127
Saves	0	2.791	0	0.15	0
Blocks	7	5.594	1.251	0.07	0.088
Takeaways	4	3.894	1.027	0.12	0.123
Passes	37	20.699	1.787	0.08	0.143
Faceoff win rate	0.143	0.5	0.286	0.03	0.009

Σ 0.949 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.116 → ×100 = 111.64 → 112

Offensive5.02

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.075	0.111	0.4	1.896
Shooting %	0.375	0.448	0.2	1.071
Assists per pass	0.081	0.104	0.4	2.051

Σ contribution = 5.019

Defensive6.07

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.791	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	7	5.594	6.985	0.2	1.397
Takeaways	4	3.894	6.108	0.25	1.527
Goals conceded	3	7.136	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.072

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Richard Tantrum Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.26	2.04	0.23	-1.109	-0.255
Assists	1	2.16	1.91	0.19	-0.606	-0.115
Shots	0	5.05	3.76	0.09	-1.344	-0.121
Passes	14	20.7	8.67	0.08	-0.772	-0.062
Saves	9	2.79	3.55	0.19	1.748	0.332
Blocks	17	5.59	4.09	0.11	2.789	0.307
Takeaways	3	3.89	2.93	0.11	-0.305	-0.034

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.052 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.104, then +0.35 saves, +0.3 blocks, −0.2 goals against → 6.6

Pucker+112

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	4.175	0.24	0.32	0.077
Shots	0	5.052	0	0.08	0
Saves	9	2.791	3.225	0.15	0.484
Blocks	17	5.594	3.039	0.07	0.213
Takeaways	3	3.894	0.77	0.12	0.092
Passes	14	20.699	0.676	0.08	0.054
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 0.956 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.124 − 0.005 turnover penalty = 1.119 → ×100 = 111.97 → 112

Offensive3.84

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.022	0.111	0.4	1.337
Shooting %	0	0.448	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.071	0.104	0.4	1.913

Σ contribution = 3.841

Defensive7.51

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	9	2.791	9.908	0.3	2.972
Blocks	17	5.594	9.867	0.2	1.973
Takeaways	3	3.894	5.097	0.25	1.274
Goals conceded	9	7.136	5.183	0.25	1.296

Σ contribution = 7.515

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Square Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.26	2.04	0.23	-0.619	-0.142
Assists	1	2.16	1.91	0.19	-0.606	-0.115
Shots	2	5.05	3.76	0.09	-0.812	-0.073
Passes	18	20.7	8.67	0.08	-0.311	-0.025
Saves	5	2.79	3.55	0.19	0.622	0.118
Blocks	7	5.59	4.09	0.11	0.344	0.038
Takeaways	4	3.89	2.93	0.11	0.036	0.004

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.196 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.609, then −0.2 goals against → 5.4

Pucker+89

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	4.175	0.479	0.32	0.153
Shots	2	5.052	0.396	0.08	0.032
Saves	5	2.791	1.792	0.15	0.269
Blocks	7	5.594	1.251	0.07	0.088
Takeaways	4	3.894	1.027	0.12	0.123
Passes	18	20.699	0.87	0.08	0.07
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.758 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.892 → ×100 = 89.19 → 89

Offensive5.59

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.125	0.111	0.4	2.597
Shooting %	0.5	0.448	0.2	1.293
Assists per pass	0.056	0.104	0.4	1.703

Σ contribution = 5.593

Defensive6.81

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	2.791	8.637	0.3	2.591
Blocks	7	5.594	6.985	0.2	1.397
Takeaways	4	3.894	6.108	0.25	1.527
Goals conceded	9	7.136	5.183	0.25	1.296

Σ contribution = 6.811

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

axe Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.26	2.04	0.23	-0.128	-0.029
Assists	1	2.16	1.91	0.19	-0.606	-0.115
Shots	2	5.05	3.76	0.09	-0.812	-0.073
Passes	16	20.7	8.67	0.08	-0.542	-0.043
Saves	1	2.79	3.55	0.19	-0.504	-0.096
Blocks	3	5.59	4.09	0.11	-0.634	-0.07
Takeaways	3	3.89	2.93	0.11	-0.305	-0.034

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.46 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.08, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.1

Pucker+61

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	4.175	0.719	0.32	0.23
Shots	2	5.052	0.396	0.08	0.032
Saves	1	2.791	0.358	0.15	0.054
Blocks	3	5.594	0.536	0.07	0.038
Takeaways	3	3.894	0.77	0.12	0.092
Passes	16	20.699	0.773	0.08	0.062
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.499	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.552 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.65 − 0.043 turnover penalty = 0.607 → ×100 = 60.63 → 61

Offensive7.23

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.214	0.111	0.4	3.566
Shooting %	1	0.448	0.2	1.875
Assists per pass	0.062	0.104	0.4	1.792

Σ contribution = 7.234

Defensive4.54

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.791	3.736	0.3	1.121
Blocks	3	5.594	4.268	0.2	0.854
Takeaways	3	3.894	5.097	0.25	1.274
Goals conceded	9	7.136	5.183	0.25	1.296

Σ contribution = 4.545

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.