Orange County low taper fades vs Cowtown Dandy Skaters

OCHomeOrange County low taper fades

9–5Final

Away · CDSCowtown Dandy Skaters

Feb 5, 2025 · Central C · Ninjas room

MVP [OCP] YackSlack · 8.7 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Orange County low taper fadesvsCowtown Dandy Skaters

14Shots113

8Saves35

9Faceoffs won27

12Takeaways75

5Turnovers↓712

30Blocks1911

57Passes1443

1:50Possession0:401:10

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Orange County low taper fades

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[CHA/LBS] maiaa^^🐙	3	2	5	4	3	4	1	1	0	10	16	0:14	132	8.65	6.59
[OCP] YackSlack	2	5	7	4	5	2	3	8	2	13	14	1:02	208	7.99	8.86
[OCRT] Carti	4	3	7	6	0	3	3	3	3	7	27	0:34	140	8.06	5.45

Cowtown Dandy Skaters

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[DDS] LessThanDennis	1	2	3	3	1	1	3	0	3	3	16	0:32	69	6.39	3.98
[HFWF] jsTronix	0	1	1	1	4	4	2	2	2	5	12	0:13	78	4.99	6.12
[OKG] Pip Starlather	4	1	5	9	0	2	4	3	7	3	15	0:25	94	6.88	4.42

maiaa^^🐙 Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.72	1.63	0.23	0.784	0.18
Assists	2	1.4	1.4	0.19	0.429	0.081
Shots	4	3.8	2.77	0.09	0.073	0.007
Passes	16	15.69	7.12	0.08	0.044	0.004
Saves	3	2.07	2.71	0.19	0.343	0.065
Blocks	10	5.96	4.14	0.11	0.975	0.107
Takeaways	1	2.92	2.58	0.11	-0.743	-0.082

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.363 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.725, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.0

Pucker+132

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.014	1.659	0.32	0.531
Shots	4	3.798	1.053	0.08	0.084
Saves	3	2.071	1.448	0.15	0.217
Blocks	10	5.96	1.678	0.07	0.117
Takeaways	1	2.919	0.343	0.12	0.041
Passes	16	15.686	1.02	0.08	0.082
Faceoff win rate	0.8	0.499	1.602	0.03	0.048

Σ 1.121 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.318 → ×100 = 131.83 → 132

Offensive8.65

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.357	0.094	0.4	3.988
Shooting %	0.75	0.454	0.2	1.659
Assists per pass	0.125	0.089	0.4	3.008

Σ contribution = 8.655

Defensive6.59

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.071	7.682	0.3	2.305
Blocks	10	5.96	8.361	0.2	1.672
Takeaways	1	2.919	3.693	0.25	0.923
Goals conceded	5	5.975	6.77	0.25	1.693

Σ contribution = 6.593

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

YackSlack Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.72	1.63	0.23	0.17	0.039
Assists	5	1.4	1.4	0.19	2.575	0.489
Shots	4	3.8	2.77	0.09	0.073	0.007
Passes	14	15.69	7.12	0.08	-0.237	-0.019
Saves	5	2.07	2.71	0.19	1.083	0.206
Blocks	13	5.96	4.14	0.11	1.7	0.187
Takeaways	8	2.92	2.58	0.11	1.967	0.216

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.125 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.25, then +0.4 playmaker → 8.7

Pucker+208

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7	3.014	2.323	0.32	0.743
Shots	4	3.798	1.053	0.08	0.084
Saves	5	2.071	2.414	0.15	0.362
Blocks	13	5.96	2.181	0.07	0.153
Takeaways	8	2.919	2.74	0.12	0.329
Passes	14	15.686	0.892	0.08	0.071
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.499	0.801	0.03	0.024

Σ 1.767 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 2.078 → ×100 = 207.82 → 208

Offensive7.99

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.113	0.094	0.4	2.712
Shooting %	0.5	0.454	0.2	1.281
Assists per pass	0.357	0.089	0.4	3.992

Σ contribution = 7.985

Defensive8.86

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	2.071	9.553	0.3	2.866
Blocks	13	5.96	9.312	0.2	1.862
Takeaways	8	2.919	9.761	0.25	2.44
Goals conceded	5	5.975	6.77	0.25	1.693

Σ contribution = 8.861

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Carti Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.72	1.63	0.23	1.399	0.322
Assists	3	1.4	1.4	0.19	1.144	0.217
Shots	6	3.8	2.77	0.09	0.794	0.071
Passes	27	15.69	7.12	0.08	1.589	0.127
Saves	0	2.07	2.71	0.19	-0.766	-0.145
Blocks	7	5.96	4.14	0.11	0.251	0.028
Takeaways	3	2.92	2.58	0.11	0.031	0.003

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.623 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.247, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.5

Pucker+140

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6.5	3.014	2.157	0.32	0.69
Shots	6	3.798	1.58	0.08	0.126
Saves	0	2.071	0	0.15	0
Blocks	7	5.96	1.175	0.07	0.082
Takeaways	3	2.919	1.028	0.12	0.123
Passes	27	15.686	1.721	0.08	0.138
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.499	1.002	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.19 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.4 − 0.003 turnover penalty = 1.397 → ×100 = 139.66 → 140

Offensive8.06

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.206	0.094	0.4	3.726
Shooting %	0.667	0.454	0.2	1.55
Assists per pass	0.111	0.089	0.4	2.783

Σ contribution = 8.059

Defensive5.45

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.071	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	7	5.96	6.691	0.2	1.338
Takeaways	3	2.919	6.111	0.25	1.528
Goals conceded	5	5.975	6.77	0.25	1.693

Σ contribution = 5.445

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

LessThanDennis Cowtown Dandy Skaters

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.72	1.63	0.23	-0.445	-0.102
Assists	2	1.4	1.4	0.19	0.429	0.081
Shots	3	3.8	2.77	0.09	-0.288	-0.026
Passes	16	15.69	7.12	0.08	0.044	0.004
Saves	1	2.07	2.71	0.19	-0.396	-0.075
Blocks	3	5.96	4.14	0.11	-0.714	-0.079
Takeaways	0	2.92	2.58	0.11	-1.13	-0.124

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.321 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.357, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.0

Pucker+69

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.014	0.995	0.32	0.319
Shots	3	3.798	0.79	0.08	0.063
Saves	1	2.071	0.483	0.15	0.072
Blocks	3	5.96	0.503	0.07	0.035
Takeaways	0	2.919	0	0.12	0
Passes	16	15.686	1.02	0.08	0.082
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.499	0.501	0.03	0.015

Σ 0.586 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.689 − 0.003 turnover penalty = 0.686 → ×100 = 68.62 → 69

Offensive6.39

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.094	0.094	0.4	2.391
Shooting %	0.333	0.454	0.2	0.993
Assists per pass	0.125	0.089	0.4	3.008

Σ contribution = 6.391

Defensive3.98

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.071	4.098	0.3	1.229
Blocks	3	5.96	4.162	0.2	0.832
Takeaways	0	2.919	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	9	5.975	4.704	0.25	1.176

Σ contribution = 3.975

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

jsTronix Cowtown Dandy Skaters

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.72	1.63	0.23	-1.059	-0.244
Assists	1	1.4	1.4	0.19	-0.287	-0.054
Shots	1	3.8	2.77	0.09	-1.01	-0.091
Passes	12	15.69	7.12	0.08	-0.518	-0.041
Saves	4	2.07	2.71	0.19	0.713	0.135
Blocks	5	5.96	4.14	0.11	-0.232	-0.025
Takeaways	2	2.92	2.58	0.11	-0.356	-0.039

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.359 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.281, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.9

Pucker+78

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.014	0.332	0.32	0.106
Shots	1	3.798	0.263	0.08	0.021
Saves	4	2.071	1.931	0.15	0.29
Blocks	5	5.96	0.839	0.07	0.059
Takeaways	2	2.919	0.685	0.12	0.082
Passes	12	15.686	0.765	0.08	0.061
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.499	1.335	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.659 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.775 → ×100 = 77.54 → 78

Offensive4.99

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.077	0.094	0.4	2.109
Shooting %	0	0.454	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.083	0.089	0.4	2.293

Σ contribution = 4.993

Defensive6.12

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.071	8.924	0.3	2.677
Blocks	5	5.96	5.361	0.2	1.072
Takeaways	2	2.919	4.78	0.25	1.195
Goals conceded	9	5.975	4.704	0.25	1.176

Σ contribution = 6.12

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Pip Starlather Cowtown Dandy Skaters

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.72	1.63	0.23	1.399	0.322
Assists	1	1.4	1.4	0.19	-0.287	-0.054
Shots	9	3.8	2.77	0.09	1.877	0.169
Passes	15	15.69	7.12	0.08	-0.096	-0.008
Saves	0	2.07	2.71	0.19	-0.766	-0.145
Blocks	3	5.96	4.14	0.11	-0.714	-0.079
Takeaways	3	2.92	2.58	0.11	0.031	0.003

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.208 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.416, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.9

Pucker+94

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.014	1.659	0.32	0.531
Shots	9	3.798	2.37	0.08	0.19
Saves	0	2.071	0	0.15	0
Blocks	3	5.96	0.503	0.07	0.035
Takeaways	3	2.919	1.028	0.12	0.123
Passes	15	15.686	0.956	0.08	0.076
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.499	0.668	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.976 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.148 − 0.207 turnover penalty = 0.941 → ×100 = 94.03 → 94

Offensive6.88

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.2	0.094	0.4	3.693
Shooting %	0.444	0.454	0.2	1.183
Assists per pass	0.067	0.089	0.4	2.003

Σ contribution = 6.88

Defensive4.42

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.071	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	3	5.96	4.162	0.2	0.832
Takeaways	3	2.919	6.111	0.25	1.528
Goals conceded	9	5.975	4.704	0.25	1.176

Σ contribution = 4.422

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.