Pennsylvania Ball-Peen Hammers vs New England Harbor

Home · BPHPennsylvania Ball-Peen Hammers

3–10Final

NEAwayNew England Harbor

Oct 21, 2024 · Major League · Trojan Centre

MVP [LIL] SOMEONE · 8.2 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Pennsylvania Ball-Peen HammersvsNew England Harbor

7Shots1118

8Saves44

13Faceoffs won103

10Takeaways111

11Turnovers↓110

23Blocks419

53Passes255

1:57Possession0:492:46

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Pennsylvania Ball-Peen Hammers

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[HEAT] Bray	0	1	1	1	0	4	1	0	4	11	10	0:19	34	4.91	4.50
[MIA] Zesh	0	1	1	1	2	6	2	6	6	8	20	1:14	63	3.62	6.14
[SSS] Mokai	3	0	3	5	6	3	0	4	1	4	23	0:24	117	5.43	6.50

New England Harbor

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[BOAT] GoldenKnight	4	1	5	10	0	1	6	1	5	2	25	1	0:33	79	5.89	4.73
[COW] IAM FOREHEAD	3	3	6	3	1	0	5	3	2	5	16	0	0:24	87	9.39	5.70
[LIL] SOMEONE	3	6	9	5	3	2	2	7	3	12	14	0	1:49	159	7.56	8.23

Bray Pennsylvania Ball-Peen Hammers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR3.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.25	1.8	0.23	-1.254	-0.288
Assists	1	2.08	1.71	0.19	-0.633	-0.12
Shots	1	4.68	2.71	0.09	-1.356	-0.122
Passes	10	23.5	9.14	0.08	-1.476	-0.118
Saves	0	2.43	2.7	0.19	-0.9	-0.171
Blocks	11	6.55	3.71	0.11	1.199	0.132
Takeaways	0	3.96	2.94	0.11	-1.345	-0.148

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.836 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.328, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 3.9

Pucker+34

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	4.116	0.243	0.32	0.078
Shots	1	4.68	0.214	0.08	0.017
Saves	0	2.428	0	0.15	0
Blocks	11	6.552	1.679	0.07	0.118
Takeaways	0	3.961	0	0.12	0
Passes	10	23.5	0.426	0.08	0.034
Faceoff win rate	0.8	0.5	1.6	0.03	0.048

Σ 0.294 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.346 − 0.002 turnover penalty = 0.344 → ×100 = 34.47 → 34

Offensive4.91

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.053	0.097	0.4	1.717
Shooting %	0	0.481	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.1	0.089	0.4	2.605

Σ contribution = 4.913

Defensive4.50

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.428	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	11	6.552	8.363	0.2	1.673
Takeaways	0	3.961	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	10	6.971	4.824	0.25	1.206

Σ contribution = 4.503

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Zesh Pennsylvania Ball-Peen Hammers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.25	1.8	0.23	-1.254	-0.288
Assists	1	2.08	1.71	0.19	-0.633	-0.12
Shots	1	4.68	2.71	0.09	-1.356	-0.122
Passes	20	23.5	9.14	0.08	-0.383	-0.031
Saves	2	2.43	2.7	0.19	-0.159	-0.03
Blocks	8	6.55	3.71	0.11	0.39	0.043
Takeaways	6	3.96	2.94	0.11	0.693	0.076

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.472 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.055, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.4

Pucker+63

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	4.116	0.243	0.32	0.078
Shots	1	4.68	0.214	0.08	0.017
Saves	2	2.428	0.824	0.15	0.124
Blocks	8	6.552	1.221	0.07	0.085
Takeaways	6	3.961	1.515	0.12	0.182
Passes	20	23.5	0.851	0.08	0.068
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.599 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.704 − 0.077 turnover penalty = 0.627 → ×100 = 62.7 → 63

Offensive3.62

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.014	0.097	0.4	1.286
Shooting %	0	0.481	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.05	0.089	0.4	1.744

Σ contribution = 3.62

Defensive6.14

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.428	5.302	0.3	1.591
Blocks	8	6.552	6.87	0.2	1.374
Takeaways	6	3.961	7.895	0.25	1.974
Goals conceded	10	6.971	4.824	0.25	1.206

Σ contribution = 6.145

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Mokai Pennsylvania Ball-Peen Hammers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.25	1.8	0.23	0.417	0.096
Assists	0	2.08	1.71	0.19	-1.218	-0.231
Shots	5	4.68	2.71	0.09	0.118	0.011
Passes	23	23.5	9.14	0.08	-0.055	-0.004
Saves	6	2.43	2.7	0.19	1.324	0.251
Blocks	4	6.55	3.71	0.11	-0.688	-0.076
Takeaways	4	3.96	2.94	0.11	0.013	0.001

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.048 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.096, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.1

Pucker+117

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	4.116	0.729	0.32	0.233
Shots	5	4.68	1.068	0.08	0.085
Saves	6	2.428	2.471	0.15	0.371
Blocks	4	6.552	0.61	0.07	0.043
Takeaways	4	3.961	1.01	0.12	0.121
Passes	23	23.5	0.979	0.08	0.078
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.992 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.167 → ×100 = 116.66 → 117

Offensive5.43

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.125	0.097	0.4	2.854
Shooting %	0.6	0.481	0.2	1.394
Assists per pass	0	0.089	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.429

Defensive6.50

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	6	2.428	9.599	0.3	2.88
Blocks	4	6.552	4.516	0.2	0.903
Takeaways	4	3.961	6.04	0.25	1.51
Goals conceded	10	6.971	4.824	0.25	1.206

Σ contribution = 6.499

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

GoldenKnight New England Harbor

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.25	1.8	0.23	0.974	0.224
Assists	1	2.08	1.71	0.19	-0.633	-0.12
Shots	10	4.68	2.71	0.09	1.96	0.176
Passes	25	23.5	9.14	0.08	0.164	0.013
Saves	0	2.43	2.7	0.19	-0.9	-0.171
Blocks	2	6.55	3.71	0.11	-1.227	-0.135
Takeaways	1	3.96	2.94	0.11	-1.006	-0.111

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.123 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.753, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.6

Pucker+79

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	4.116	1.215	0.32	0.389
Shots	10	4.68	2.137	0.08	0.171
Saves	0	2.428	0	0.15	0
Blocks	2	6.552	0.305	0.07	0.021
Takeaways	1	3.961	0.252	0.12	0.03
Passes	25	23.5	1.064	0.08	0.085
Faceoff win rate	0.143	0.5	0.286	0.03	0.009

Σ 0.705 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.829 − 0.04 turnover penalty = 0.789 → ×100 = 78.99 → 79

Offensive5.89

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.152	0.097	0.4	3.22
Shooting %	0.4	0.481	0.2	1.066
Assists per pass	0.04	0.089	0.4	1.601

Σ contribution = 5.887

Defensive4.73

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.428	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	2	6.552	3.596	0.2	0.719
Takeaways	1	3.961	3.465	0.25	0.866
Goals conceded	3	6.971	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 4.733

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

IAM FOREHEAD New England Harbor

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.25	1.8	0.23	0.417	0.096
Assists	3	2.08	1.71	0.19	0.537	0.102
Shots	3	4.68	2.71	0.09	-0.619	-0.056
Passes	16	23.5	9.14	0.08	-0.82	-0.066
Saves	1	2.43	2.7	0.19	-0.529	-0.101
Blocks	5	6.55	3.71	0.11	-0.419	-0.046
Takeaways	3	3.96	2.94	0.11	-0.326	-0.036

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.106 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.788, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.0

Pucker+87

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5.5	4.116	1.336	0.32	0.428
Shots	3	4.68	0.641	0.08	0.051
Saves	1	2.428	0.412	0.15	0.062
Blocks	5	6.552	0.763	0.07	0.053
Takeaways	3	3.961	0.757	0.12	0.091
Passes	16	23.5	0.681	0.08	0.054
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.739 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.87 → ×100 = 86.99 → 87

Offensive9.39

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.25	0.097	0.4	3.871
Shooting %	1	0.481	0.2	1.834
Assists per pass	0.188	0.089	0.4	3.69

Σ contribution = 9.395

Defensive5.70

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.428	3.886	0.3	1.166
Blocks	5	6.552	5.07	0.2	1.014
Takeaways	3	3.961	5.048	0.25	1.262
Goals conceded	3	6.971	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.704

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

SOMEONE New England Harbor

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.25	1.8	0.23	0.417	0.096
Assists	6	2.08	1.71	0.19	2.293	0.436
Shots	5	4.68	2.71	0.09	0.118	0.011
Passes	14	23.5	9.14	0.08	-1.039	-0.083
Saves	3	2.43	2.7	0.19	0.212	0.04
Blocks	12	6.55	3.71	0.11	1.469	0.162
Takeaways	7	3.96	2.94	0.11	1.032	0.114

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.774 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.549, then +0.4 playmaker, +0.25 hot shooting → 8.2

Pucker+159

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	8.5	4.116	2.065	0.32	0.661
Shots	5	4.68	1.068	0.08	0.085
Saves	3	2.428	1.236	0.15	0.185
Blocks	12	6.552	1.831	0.07	0.128
Takeaways	7	3.961	1.767	0.12	0.212
Passes	14	23.5	0.596	0.08	0.048
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.35 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.588 → ×100 = 158.77 → 159

Offensive7.56

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.083	0.097	0.4	2.167
Shooting %	0.6	0.481	0.2	1.394
Assists per pass	0.429	0.089	0.4	3.998

Σ contribution = 7.559

Defensive8.23

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.428	6.925	0.3	2.078
Blocks	12	6.552	8.725	0.2	1.745
Takeaways	7	3.961	8.581	0.25	2.145
Goals conceded	3	6.971	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 8.23

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.