Jersey City Grinders vs Chattahoochee Chubs

Home · JCGJersey City Grinders

5–15Final

CCAwayChattahoochee Chubs

Nov 17, 2024 · Open Division · The Grinder Dome

MVP easymac · 8.1 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Jersey City GrindersvsChattahoochee Chubs

7Shots1219

4Saves22

6Faceoffs won915

3Takeaways58

8Turnovers↓53

16Blocks420

36Passes2460

0:32Possession2:403:12

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Jersey City Grinders

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Bobbyboy-3k	2	1	3	3	0	2	3	3	6	7	18	0:18	57	5.89	4.68
InterJoe95	1	1	2	1	3	3	5	0	0	7	10	0:03	65	8.01	5.30
Kraaazy	2	0	2	3	1	1	7	0	2	2	8	0:11	43	5.58	3.70

Chattahoochee Chubs

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
easymac	7	3	10	9	1	9	4	2	1	4	16	0:44	156	8.30	5.24
Lincolng4	4	3	7	4	0	4	1	3	1	6	28	0:26	123	7.76	5.45
Reeko	4	5	9	6	1	2	1	3	1	10	16	2:02	142	7.07	6.24

Bobbyboy-3k Jersey City Grinders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.22	1.9	0.23	-0.118	-0.027
Assists	1	1.73	1.59	0.19	-0.456	-0.087
Shots	3	4.3	3.15	0.09	-0.412	-0.037
Passes	18	15.37	7.22	0.08	0.365	0.029
Saves	0	2.08	2.21	0.19	-0.94	-0.179
Blocks	7	6.68	4.29	0.11	0.074	0.008
Takeaways	3	2.89	2.67	0.11	0.039	0.004

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.288 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.425, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.2

Pucker+57

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.807	0.788	0.32	0.252
Shots	3	4.297	0.698	0.08	0.056
Saves	0	2.077	0	0.15	0
Blocks	7	6.684	1.047	0.07	0.073
Takeaways	3	2.895	1.036	0.12	0.124
Passes	18	15.367	1.171	0.08	0.094
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.623 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.733 − 0.162 turnover penalty = 0.571 → ×100 = 57.13 → 57

Offensive5.89

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.167	0.132	0.4	2.811
Shooting %	0.667	0.517	0.2	1.424
Assists per pass	0.056	0.112	0.4	1.654

Σ contribution = 5.89

Defensive4.68

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.077	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	7	6.684	6.189	0.2	1.238
Takeaways	3	2.895	6.145	0.25	1.536
Goals conceded	15	7.188	4.087	0.25	1.022

Σ contribution = 4.682

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

InterJoe95 Jersey City Grinders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.22	1.9	0.23	-0.643	-0.148
Assists	1	1.73	1.59	0.19	-0.456	-0.087
Shots	1	4.3	3.15	0.09	-1.046	-0.094
Passes	10	15.37	7.22	0.08	-0.743	-0.059
Saves	3	2.08	2.21	0.19	0.418	0.079
Blocks	7	6.68	4.29	0.11	0.074	0.008
Takeaways	0	2.89	2.67	0.11	-1.084	-0.119

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.42 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.16, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.2

Pucker+65

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.807	0.525	0.32	0.168
Shots	1	4.297	0.233	0.08	0.019
Saves	3	2.077	1.444	0.15	0.217
Blocks	7	6.684	1.047	0.07	0.073
Takeaways	0	2.895	0	0.12	0
Passes	10	15.367	0.651	0.08	0.052
Faceoff win rate	0.375	0.5	0.75	0.03	0.022

Σ 0.551 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.649 → ×100 = 64.85 → 65

Offensive8.01

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.667	0.132	0.4	3.999
Shooting %	1	0.517	0.2	1.785
Assists per pass	0.1	0.112	0.4	2.225

Σ contribution = 8.01

Defensive5.30

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.077	7.669	0.3	2.301
Blocks	7	6.684	6.189	0.2	1.238
Takeaways	0	2.895	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	15	7.188	4.087	0.25	1.022

Σ contribution = 5.299

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Kraaazy Jersey City Grinders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.22	1.9	0.23	-0.118	-0.027
Assists	0	1.73	1.59	0.19	-1.084	-0.206
Shots	3	4.3	3.15	0.09	-0.412	-0.037
Passes	8	15.37	7.22	0.08	-1.02	-0.082
Saves	1	2.08	2.21	0.19	-0.487	-0.093
Blocks	2	6.68	4.29	0.11	-1.092	-0.12
Takeaways	0	2.89	2.67	0.11	-1.084	-0.119

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.684 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.633, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.7

Pucker+43

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.807	0.525	0.32	0.168
Shots	3	4.297	0.698	0.08	0.056
Saves	1	2.077	0.481	0.15	0.072
Blocks	2	6.684	0.299	0.07	0.021
Takeaways	0	2.895	0	0.12	0
Passes	8	15.367	0.521	0.08	0.042
Faceoff win rate	0.125	0.5	0.25	0.03	0.007

Σ 0.366 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.431 → ×100 = 43.09 → 43

Offensive5.58

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.182	0.132	0.4	2.977
Shooting %	0.667	0.517	0.2	1.424
Assists per pass	0	0.112	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.583

Defensive3.70

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.077	4.094	0.3	1.228
Blocks	2	6.684	3.581	0.2	0.716
Takeaways	0	2.895	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	15	7.188	4.087	0.25	1.022

Σ contribution = 3.704

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

easymac Chattahoochee Chubs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	7	2.22	1.9	0.23	2.51	0.577
Assists	3	1.73	1.59	0.19	0.8	0.152
Shots	9	4.3	3.15	0.09	1.492	0.134
Passes	16	15.37	7.22	0.08	0.088	0.007
Saves	1	2.08	2.21	0.19	-0.487	-0.093
Blocks	4	6.68	4.29	0.11	-0.626	-0.069
Takeaways	2	2.89	2.67	0.11	-0.335	-0.037

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.673 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.345, then +0.5 hat trick, +0.25 hot shooting → 8.1

Pucker+156

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	10	3.807	2.627	0.32	0.84
Shots	9	4.297	2.094	0.08	0.168
Saves	1	2.077	0.481	0.15	0.072
Blocks	4	6.684	0.598	0.07	0.042
Takeaways	2	2.895	0.691	0.12	0.083
Passes	16	15.367	1.041	0.08	0.083
Faceoff win rate	0.692	0.5	1.385	0.03	0.042

Σ 1.33 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.565 → ×100 = 156.46 → 156

Offensive8.30

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.227	0.132	0.4	3.389
Shooting %	0.778	0.517	0.2	1.572
Assists per pass	0.188	0.112	0.4	3.336

Σ contribution = 8.296

Defensive5.24

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.077	4.094	0.3	1.228
Blocks	4	6.684	4.475	0.2	0.895
Takeaways	2	2.895	4.802	0.25	1.2
Goals conceded	5	7.188	7.647	0.25	1.912

Σ contribution = 5.235

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Lincolng4 Chattahoochee Chubs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.22	1.9	0.23	0.934	0.215
Assists	3	1.73	1.59	0.19	0.8	0.152
Shots	4	4.3	3.15	0.09	-0.094	-0.008
Passes	28	15.37	7.22	0.08	1.75	0.14
Saves	0	2.08	2.21	0.19	-0.94	-0.179
Blocks	6	6.68	4.29	0.11	-0.16	-0.018
Takeaways	3	2.89	2.67	0.11	0.039	0.004

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.307 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.613, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.9

Pucker+123

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7	3.807	1.839	0.32	0.588
Shots	4	4.297	0.931	0.08	0.074
Saves	0	2.077	0	0.15	0
Blocks	6	6.684	0.898	0.07	0.063
Takeaways	3	2.895	1.036	0.12	0.124
Passes	28	15.367	1.822	0.08	0.146
Faceoff win rate	0.8	0.5	1.6	0.03	0.048

Σ 1.044 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.228 → ×100 = 122.8 → 123

Offensive7.76

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.269	0.132	0.4	3.645
Shooting %	1	0.517	0.2	1.785
Assists per pass	0.107	0.112	0.4	2.327

Σ contribution = 7.757

Defensive5.45

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.077	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	6	6.684	5.592	0.2	1.118
Takeaways	3	2.895	6.145	0.25	1.536
Goals conceded	5	7.188	7.647	0.25	1.912

Σ contribution = 5.452

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Reeko Chattahoochee Chubs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.22	1.9	0.23	0.934	0.215
Assists	5	1.73	1.59	0.19	2.057	0.391
Shots	6	4.3	3.15	0.09	0.54	0.049
Passes	16	15.37	7.22	0.08	0.088	0.007
Saves	1	2.08	2.21	0.19	-0.487	-0.093
Blocks	10	6.68	4.29	0.11	0.773	0.085
Takeaways	3	2.89	2.67	0.11	0.039	0.004

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.658 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.316, then +0.4 playmaker, +0.25 hot shooting → 8.0

Pucker+142

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	8	3.807	2.101	0.32	0.672
Shots	6	4.297	1.396	0.08	0.112
Saves	1	2.077	0.481	0.15	0.072
Blocks	10	6.684	1.496	0.07	0.105
Takeaways	3	2.895	1.036	0.12	0.124
Passes	16	15.367	1.041	0.08	0.083
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 1.209 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.422 → ×100 = 142.2 → 142

Offensive7.07

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.074	0.132	0.4	1.737
Shooting %	0.667	0.517	0.2	1.424
Assists per pass	0.312	0.112	0.4	3.912

Σ contribution = 7.073

Defensive6.24

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.077	4.094	0.3	1.228
Blocks	10	6.684	7.836	0.2	1.567
Takeaways	3	2.895	6.145	0.25	1.536
Goals conceded	5	7.188	7.647	0.25	1.912

Σ contribution = 6.243

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.