Ottawa Valley Tater Tots vs Champaign Champagne

OVHomeOttawa Valley Tater Tots

4–10Final

Away · CHAChampaign Champagne

Jun 5, 2024 · Prospect Division - Rockets · Potato bowl

MVP Tridoxity · 6.4 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Ottawa Valley Tater TotsvsChampaign Champagne

10Shots313

3Saves36

10Faceoffs won37

15Takeaways87

7Turnovers↓815

6Blocks60

54Passes1440

2:30Possession1:121:18

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Ottawa Valley Tater Tots

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
brandon hagel	2	1	3	2	1	4	2	6	1	3	15	0:40	110	5.93	6.42
max	1	0	1	4	1	5	3	5	3	1	15	1:09	69	3.31	5.56
conpeylil	1	2	3	4	1	1	2	4	3	2	24	0:41	99	5.21	5.86

Champaign Champagne

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
DarthDaevin	3	3	6	5	0	4	6	3	10	16	0:15	73	9.10	4.85
Square	3	1	4	4	4	0	2	3	2	12	0:30	103	6.94	6.59
Tridoxity	4	2	6	4	2	3	2	1	3	12	0:33	105	8.94	5.23

brandon hagel Ottawa Valley Tater Tots

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.06	1.74	0.23	-0.036	-0.008
Assists	1	1.53	1.37	0.19	-0.391	-0.074
Shots	2	4.22	2.79	0.09	-0.796	-0.072
Passes	15	17.81	7.16	0.08	-0.393	-0.031
Saves	1	2.16	2.15	0.19	-0.54	-0.103
Blocks	3	0.85	1	0.11	2.154	0.237
Takeaways	6	3.67	3.3	0.11	0.708	0.078

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.027 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.053, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.1

Pucker+110

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.465	0.866	0.32	0.277
Shots	2	4.222	0.474	0.08	0.038
Saves	1	2.16	0.463	0.15	0.069
Blocks	3	0.854	3.512	0.07	0.246
Takeaways	6	3.667	1.636	0.12	0.196
Passes	15	17.812	0.842	0.08	0.067
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.934 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.099 → ×100 = 109.88 → 110

Offensive5.93

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.075	0.096	0.4	2.058
Shooting %	1	0.488	0.2	1.825
Assists per pass	0.067	0.086	0.4	2.044

Σ contribution = 5.926

Defensive6.42

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.16	4.037	0.3	1.211
Blocks	3	0.854	9.948	0.2	1.99
Takeaways	6	3.667	8.25	0.25	2.062
Goals conceded	10	6.479	4.647	0.25	1.162

Σ contribution = 6.425

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

max Ottawa Valley Tater Tots

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.06	1.74	0.23	-0.61	-0.14
Assists	0	1.53	1.37	0.19	-1.121	-0.213
Shots	4	4.22	2.79	0.09	-0.08	-0.007
Passes	15	17.81	7.16	0.08	-0.393	-0.031
Saves	1	2.16	2.15	0.19	-0.54	-0.103
Blocks	1	0.85	1	0.11	0.146	0.016
Takeaways	5	3.67	3.3	0.11	0.404	0.044

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.434 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.132, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.7

Pucker+69

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.465	0.289	0.32	0.092
Shots	4	4.222	0.947	0.08	0.076
Saves	1	2.16	0.463	0.15	0.069
Blocks	1	0.854	1.171	0.07	0.082
Takeaways	5	3.667	1.364	0.12	0.164
Passes	15	17.812	0.842	0.08	0.067
Faceoff win rate	0.625	0.5	1.25	0.03	0.037

Σ 0.588 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.692 → ×100 = 69.18 → 69

Offensive3.31

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.014	0.096	0.4	1.295
Shooting %	0.25	0.488	0.2	0.838
Assists per pass	0	0.086	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.314

Defensive5.56

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.16	4.037	0.3	1.211
Blocks	1	0.854	6.676	0.2	1.335
Takeaways	5	3.667	7.394	0.25	1.848
Goals conceded	10	6.479	4.647	0.25	1.162

Σ contribution = 5.556

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

conpeylil Ottawa Valley Tater Tots

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.06	1.74	0.23	-0.61	-0.14
Assists	2	1.53	1.37	0.19	0.34	0.065
Shots	4	4.22	2.79	0.09	-0.08	-0.007
Passes	24	17.81	7.16	0.08	0.864	0.069
Saves	1	2.16	2.15	0.19	-0.54	-0.103
Blocks	2	0.85	1	0.11	1.15	0.127
Takeaways	4	3.67	3.3	0.11	0.101	0.011

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.021 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.043, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.6

Pucker+99

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.465	0.866	0.32	0.277
Shots	4	4.222	0.947	0.08	0.076
Saves	1	2.16	0.463	0.15	0.069
Blocks	2	0.854	2.341	0.07	0.164
Takeaways	4	3.667	1.091	0.12	0.131
Passes	24	17.812	1.347	0.08	0.108
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.845 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.994 → ×100 = 99.4 → 99

Offensive5.21

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.073	0.096	0.4	2.029
Shooting %	0.25	0.488	0.2	0.838
Assists per pass	0.083	0.086	0.4	2.348

Σ contribution = 5.214

Defensive5.86

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.16	4.037	0.3	1.211
Blocks	2	0.854	9.488	0.2	1.898
Takeaways	4	3.667	6.363	0.25	1.591
Goals conceded	10	6.479	4.647	0.25	1.162

Σ contribution = 5.862

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

DarthDaevin Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.06	1.74	0.23	0.538	0.124
Assists	3	1.53	1.37	0.19	1.071	0.203
Shots	5	4.22	2.79	0.09	0.279	0.025
Passes	16	17.81	7.16	0.08	-0.253	-0.02
Saves	0	2.16	2.15	0.19	-1.006	-0.191
Blocks	0	0.85	1	0.11	-0.857	-0.094
Takeaways	3	3.67	3.3	0.11	-0.202	-0.022

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.024 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.049, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 6.0

Pucker+73

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.465	1.731	0.32	0.554
Shots	5	4.222	1.184	0.08	0.095
Saves	0	2.16	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.854	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	3	3.667	0.818	0.12	0.098
Passes	16	17.812	0.898	0.08	0.072
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.843 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.992 − 0.26 turnover penalty = 0.732 → ×100 = 73.17 → 73

Offensive9.10

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.4	0.096	0.4	3.994
Shooting %	0.6	0.488	0.2	1.379
Assists per pass	0.188	0.086	0.4	3.722

Σ contribution = 9.096

Defensive4.85

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.16	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.854	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	3	3.667	5.281	0.25	1.32
Goals conceded	4	6.479	8.204	0.25	2.051

Σ contribution = 4.848

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Square Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.06	1.74	0.23	0.538	0.124
Assists	1	1.53	1.37	0.19	-0.391	-0.074
Shots	4	4.22	2.79	0.09	-0.08	-0.007
Passes	12	17.81	7.16	0.08	-0.812	-0.065
Saves	4	2.16	2.15	0.19	0.857	0.163
Blocks	0	0.85	1	0.11	-0.857	-0.094
Takeaways	3	3.67	3.3	0.11	-0.202	-0.022

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.024 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.047, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.3

Pucker+103

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.465	1.154	0.32	0.369
Shots	4	4.222	0.947	0.08	0.076
Saves	4	2.16	1.852	0.15	0.278
Blocks	0	0.854	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	3	3.667	0.818	0.12	0.098
Passes	12	17.812	0.674	0.08	0.054
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.875 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.029 → ×100 = 102.95 → 103

Offensive6.94

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.133	0.096	0.4	2.996
Shooting %	0.75	0.488	0.2	1.592
Assists per pass	0.083	0.086	0.4	2.348

Σ contribution = 6.935

Defensive6.59

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.16	8.769	0.3	2.631
Blocks	0	0.854	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	3	3.667	5.281	0.25	1.32
Goals conceded	4	6.479	8.204	0.25	2.051

Σ contribution = 6.593

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Tridoxity Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.06	1.74	0.23	1.112	0.256
Assists	2	1.53	1.37	0.19	0.34	0.065
Shots	4	4.22	2.79	0.09	-0.08	-0.007
Passes	12	17.81	7.16	0.08	-0.812	-0.065
Saves	2	2.16	2.15	0.19	-0.074	-0.014
Blocks	0	0.85	1	0.11	-0.857	-0.094
Takeaways	1	3.67	3.3	0.11	-0.809	-0.089

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.051 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.101, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.4

Pucker+105

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.465	1.731	0.32	0.554
Shots	4	4.222	0.947	0.08	0.076
Saves	2	2.16	0.926	0.15	0.139
Blocks	0	0.854	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	1	3.667	0.273	0.12	0.033
Passes	12	17.812	0.674	0.08	0.054
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 0.891 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.049 → ×100 = 104.87 → 105

Offensive8.94

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.182	0.096	0.4	3.544
Shooting %	1	0.488	0.2	1.825
Assists per pass	0.167	0.086	0.4	3.572

Σ contribution = 8.941

Defensive5.23

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.16	5.705	0.3	1.711
Blocks	0	0.854	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	1	3.667	3.514	0.25	0.879
Goals conceded	4	6.479	8.204	0.25	2.051

Σ contribution = 5.232

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.