Jersey City Grinders vs Ottawa Valley Tater Tots

Home · JCGJersey City Grinders

7–5Final

OVAwayOttawa Valley Tater Tots

May 15, 2024 · Prospect Division - Rockets · The Grinder Dome

MVP CatCollector33 · 8.0 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Jersey City GrindersvsOttawa Valley Tater Tots

12Shots416

11Saves65

4Faceoffs won711

9Takeaways918

18Turnovers↓99

7Blocks34

28Passes2957

0:50Possession2:503:40

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Jersey City Grinders

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Bobbyboy-3k	1	1	2	3	1	2	4	5	4	3	8	0:20	90	6.50	6.84
CatCollector33	3	3	6	4	8	1	5	1	7	3	7	0:12	158	9.59	7.64
Wavo	3	0	3	5	2	1	2	3	7	1	13	0:18	77	5.97	6.15

Ottawa Valley Tater Tots

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
brandon hagel	1	2	3	5	4	5	2	6	3	2	23	1:26	136	4.69	8.02
i ride wayne ; )	2	1	3	5	0	3	0	4	2	1	18	0:51	85	4.72	5.24
conpeylil	2	3	5	6	1	3	2	8	4	1	16	1:23	117	6.51	6.30

Bobbyboy-3k Jersey City Grinders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.06	1.74	0.23	-0.61	-0.14
Assists	1	1.53	1.37	0.19	-0.391	-0.074
Shots	3	4.22	2.79	0.09	-0.438	-0.039
Passes	8	17.81	7.16	0.08	-1.371	-0.11
Saves	1	2.16	2.15	0.19	-0.54	-0.103
Blocks	3	0.85	1	0.11	2.154	0.237
Takeaways	5	3.67	3.3	0.11	0.404	0.044

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.185 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.631, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.4

Pucker+90

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.465	0.577	0.32	0.185
Shots	3	4.222	0.711	0.08	0.057
Saves	1	2.16	0.463	0.15	0.069
Blocks	3	0.854	3.512	0.07	0.246
Takeaways	5	3.667	1.364	0.12	0.164
Passes	8	17.812	0.449	0.08	0.036
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.776 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.913 − 0.014 turnover penalty = 0.899 → ×100 = 89.95 → 90

Offensive6.50

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.1	0.096	0.4	2.47
Shooting %	0.333	0.488	0.2	0.954
Assists per pass	0.125	0.086	0.4	3.076

Σ contribution = 6.5

Defensive6.84

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.16	4.037	0.3	1.211
Blocks	3	0.854	9.948	0.2	1.99
Takeaways	5	3.667	7.394	0.25	1.848
Goals conceded	5	6.479	7.15	0.25	1.787

Σ contribution = 6.836

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

CatCollector33 Jersey City Grinders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.06	1.74	0.23	0.538	0.124
Assists	3	1.53	1.37	0.19	1.071	0.203
Shots	4	4.22	2.79	0.09	-0.08	-0.007
Passes	7	17.81	7.16	0.08	-1.511	-0.121
Saves	8	2.16	2.15	0.19	2.72	0.517
Blocks	3	0.85	1	0.11	2.154	0.237
Takeaways	1	3.67	3.3	0.11	-0.809	-0.089

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.864 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.728, then +0.35 saves, +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 8.0

Pucker+158

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5.5	3.465	1.587	0.32	0.508
Shots	4	4.222	0.947	0.08	0.076
Saves	8	2.16	3.704	0.15	0.556
Blocks	3	0.854	3.512	0.07	0.246
Takeaways	1	3.667	0.273	0.12	0.033
Passes	7	17.812	0.393	0.08	0.031
Faceoff win rate	0.167	0.5	0.333	0.03	0.01

Σ 1.459 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.717 − 0.137 turnover penalty = 1.58 → ×100 = 158 → 158

Offensive9.59

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.5	0.096	0.4	3.999
Shooting %	0.75	0.488	0.2	1.592
Assists per pass	0.429	0.086	0.4	3.999

Σ contribution = 9.59

Defensive7.64

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	8	2.16	9.964	0.3	2.989
Blocks	3	0.854	9.948	0.2	1.99
Takeaways	1	3.667	3.514	0.25	0.879
Goals conceded	5	6.479	7.15	0.25	1.787

Σ contribution = 7.645

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Wavo Jersey City Grinders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.06	1.74	0.23	0.538	0.124
Assists	0	1.53	1.37	0.19	-1.121	-0.213
Shots	5	4.22	2.79	0.09	0.279	0.025
Passes	13	17.81	7.16	0.08	-0.672	-0.054
Saves	2	2.16	2.15	0.19	-0.074	-0.014
Blocks	1	0.85	1	0.11	0.146	0.016
Takeaways	3	3.67	3.3	0.11	-0.202	-0.022

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.138 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.723, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 5.7

Pucker+77

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.465	0.866	0.32	0.277
Shots	5	4.222	1.184	0.08	0.095
Saves	2	2.16	0.926	0.15	0.139
Blocks	1	0.854	1.171	0.07	0.082
Takeaways	3	3.667	0.818	0.12	0.098
Passes	13	17.812	0.73	0.08	0.058
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.769 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.905 − 0.137 turnover penalty = 0.768 → ×100 = 76.8 → 77

Offensive5.97

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.167	0.096	0.4	3.406
Shooting %	0.6	0.488	0.2	1.379
Assists per pass	0	0.086	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.967

Defensive6.15

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.16	5.705	0.3	1.711
Blocks	1	0.854	6.676	0.2	1.335
Takeaways	3	3.667	5.281	0.25	1.32
Goals conceded	5	6.479	7.15	0.25	1.787

Σ contribution = 6.153

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

brandon hagel Ottawa Valley Tater Tots

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.06	1.74	0.23	-0.61	-0.14
Assists	2	1.53	1.37	0.19	0.34	0.065
Shots	5	4.22	2.79	0.09	0.279	0.025
Passes	23	17.81	7.16	0.08	0.725	0.058
Saves	4	2.16	2.15	0.19	0.857	0.163
Blocks	2	0.85	1	0.11	1.15	0.127
Takeaways	6	3.67	3.3	0.11	0.708	0.078

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.375 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.749, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.5

Pucker+136

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.465	0.866	0.32	0.277
Shots	5	4.222	1.184	0.08	0.095
Saves	4	2.16	1.852	0.15	0.278
Blocks	2	0.854	2.341	0.07	0.164
Takeaways	6	3.667	1.636	0.12	0.196
Passes	23	17.812	1.291	0.08	0.103
Faceoff win rate	0.714	0.5	1.429	0.03	0.043

Σ 1.156 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.36 → ×100 = 136 → 136

Offensive4.69

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.035	0.096	0.4	1.501
Shooting %	0.2	0.488	0.2	0.776
Assists per pass	0.087	0.086	0.4	2.415

Σ contribution = 4.691

Defensive8.02

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.16	8.769	0.3	2.631
Blocks	2	0.854	9.488	0.2	1.898
Takeaways	6	3.667	8.25	0.25	2.062
Goals conceded	7	6.479	5.703	0.25	1.426

Σ contribution = 8.017

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

i ride wayne ; ) Ottawa Valley Tater Tots

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.06	1.74	0.23	-0.036	-0.008
Assists	1	1.53	1.37	0.19	-0.391	-0.074
Shots	5	4.22	2.79	0.09	0.279	0.025
Passes	18	17.81	7.16	0.08	0.026	0.002
Saves	0	2.16	2.15	0.19	-1.006	-0.191
Blocks	1	0.85	1	0.11	0.146	0.016
Takeaways	4	3.67	3.3	0.11	0.101	0.011

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.219 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.562, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.4

Pucker+85

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.465	0.866	0.32	0.277
Shots	5	4.222	1.184	0.08	0.095
Saves	0	2.16	0	0.15	0
Blocks	1	0.854	1.171	0.07	0.082
Takeaways	4	3.667	1.091	0.12	0.131
Passes	18	17.812	1.011	0.08	0.081
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.725 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.853 → ×100 = 85.35 → 85

Offensive4.72

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.059	0.096	0.4	1.811
Shooting %	0.4	0.488	0.2	1.057
Assists per pass	0.056	0.086	0.4	1.854

Σ contribution = 4.722

Defensive5.24

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.16	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	1	0.854	6.676	0.2	1.335
Takeaways	4	3.667	6.363	0.25	1.591
Goals conceded	7	6.479	5.703	0.25	1.426

Σ contribution = 5.238

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

conpeylil Ottawa Valley Tater Tots

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.06	1.74	0.23	-0.036	-0.008
Assists	3	1.53	1.37	0.19	1.071	0.203
Shots	6	4.22	2.79	0.09	0.637	0.057
Passes	16	17.81	7.16	0.08	-0.253	-0.02
Saves	1	2.16	2.15	0.19	-0.54	-0.103
Blocks	1	0.85	1	0.11	0.146	0.016
Takeaways	8	3.67	3.3	0.11	1.315	0.145

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.29 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.581, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.4

Pucker+117

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.465	1.154	0.32	0.369
Shots	6	4.222	1.421	0.08	0.114
Saves	1	2.16	0.463	0.15	0.069
Blocks	1	0.854	1.171	0.07	0.082
Takeaways	8	3.667	2.182	0.12	0.262
Passes	16	17.812	0.898	0.08	0.072
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 1.004 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.181 − 0.014 turnover penalty = 1.167 → ×100 = 116.74 → 117

Offensive6.51

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.06	0.096	0.4	1.832
Shooting %	0.333	0.488	0.2	0.954
Assists per pass	0.188	0.086	0.4	3.722

Σ contribution = 6.508

Defensive6.30

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.16	4.037	0.3	1.211
Blocks	1	0.854	6.676	0.2	1.335
Takeaways	8	3.667	9.312	0.25	2.328
Goals conceded	7	6.479	5.703	0.25	1.426

Σ contribution = 6.3

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.