Sacramento Steamers vs Minneapolis Milk Duds

SSHomeSacramento Steamers

2–7Final

MMAwayMinneapolis Milk Duds

Feb 20, 2024 · Masters Division · Steam Stadium

MVP [DUD] fueeqo · 6.4 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Sacramento SteamersvsMinneapolis Milk Duds

5Shots1924

17Saves143

4Faceoffs won26

16Takeaways1228

28Turnovers↓1216

2Blocks20

38Passes2361

2:02Possession1:293:31

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Sacramento Steamers

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[SDS] Mojo	0	0	0	0	7	1	2	10	8	1	13	1:15	98	2.95	8.19
[SDS] kale	1	0	1	1	10	1	1	4	9	0	11	0:33	103	4.54	6.32
[SSS] Headass	1	1	2	4	0	2	3	2	11	1	14	0:14	38	6.38	4.76

Minneapolis Milk Duds

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[DUD] Barbeque	1	3	4	7	1	1	3	8	4	22	1:28	100	5.63	6.18
[DUD] fueeqo	4	1	5	10	2	2	1	9	6	19	0:53	132	5.54	6.81
[YY/LIL] Graves	2	0	2	7	0	3	0	11	6	20	1:10	84	3.57	6.12

Mojo Sacramento Steamers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.97	1.72	0.23	-1.142	-0.263
Assists	0	1.65	1.47	0.19	-1.126	-0.214
Shots	0	4.1	2.93	0.09	-1.399	-0.126
Passes	13	18.39	7.15	0.08	-0.754	-0.06
Saves	7	2.14	2.23	0.19	2.184	0.415
Blocks	1	0.7	1	0.11	0.302	0.033
Takeaways	10	4.66	3.24	0.11	1.65	0.181

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.033 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.933, then +0.35 saves, −0.3 turnovers → 6.0

Pucker+98

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.429	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	4.103	0	0.08	0
Saves	7	2.135	3.278	0.15	0.492
Blocks	1	0.697	1.435	0.07	0.1
Takeaways	10	4.658	2.147	0.12	0.258
Passes	13	18.394	0.707	0.08	0.057
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.926 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.09 − 0.109 turnover penalty = 0.981 → ×100 = 98.11 → 98

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.079	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.48	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.09	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive8.19

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	7	2.135	9.917	0.3	2.975
Blocks	1	0.697	7.639	0.2	1.528
Takeaways	10	4.658	9.267	0.25	2.317
Goals conceded	7	6.058	5.465	0.25	1.366

Σ contribution = 8.186

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

kale Sacramento Steamers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.97	1.72	0.23	-0.562	-0.129
Assists	0	1.65	1.47	0.19	-1.126	-0.214
Shots	1	4.1	2.93	0.09	-1.058	-0.095
Passes	11	18.39	7.15	0.08	-1.034	-0.083
Saves	10	2.14	2.23	0.19	3.531	0.671
Blocks	0	0.7	1	0.11	-0.695	-0.076
Takeaways	4	4.66	3.24	0.11	-0.203	-0.022

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.051 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.102, then +0.35 saves, +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 6.4

Pucker+103

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.429	0.292	0.32	0.093
Shots	1	4.103	0.244	0.08	0.019
Saves	10	2.135	4.683	0.15	0.702
Blocks	0	0.697	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	4	4.658	0.859	0.12	0.103
Passes	11	18.394	0.598	0.08	0.048
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.996 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.172 − 0.141 turnover penalty = 1.031 → ×100 = 103.09 → 103

Offensive4.54

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.03	0.079	0.4	1.52
Shooting %	1	0.48	0.2	1.836
Assists per pass	0	0.09	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.538

Defensive6.32

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	10	2.135	9.995	0.3	2.998
Blocks	0	0.697	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	4	4.658	5.439	0.25	1.36
Goals conceded	7	6.058	5.465	0.25	1.366

Σ contribution = 6.315

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Headass Sacramento Steamers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.97	1.72	0.23	-0.562	-0.129
Assists	1	1.65	1.47	0.19	-0.444	-0.084
Shots	4	4.1	2.93	0.09	-0.035	-0.003
Passes	14	18.39	7.15	0.08	-0.614	-0.049
Saves	0	2.14	2.23	0.19	-0.959	-0.182
Blocks	1	0.7	1	0.11	0.302	0.033
Takeaways	2	4.66	3.24	0.11	-0.821	-0.09

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.505 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.99, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 4.5

Pucker+38

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.429	0.583	0.32	0.187
Shots	4	4.103	0.975	0.08	0.078
Saves	0	2.135	0	0.15	0
Blocks	1	0.697	1.435	0.07	0.1
Takeaways	2	4.658	0.429	0.12	0.052
Passes	14	18.394	0.761	0.08	0.061
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.502 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.59 − 0.206 turnover penalty = 0.384 → ×100 = 38.43 → 38

Offensive6.38

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.143	0.079	0.4	3.462
Shooting %	0.25	0.48	0.2	0.844
Assists per pass	0.071	0.09	0.4	2.077

Σ contribution = 6.383

Defensive4.76

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.135	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	1	0.697	7.639	0.2	1.528
Takeaways	2	4.658	3.937	0.25	0.984
Goals conceded	7	6.058	5.465	0.25	1.366

Σ contribution = 4.764

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Barbeque Minneapolis Milk Duds

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.97	1.72	0.23	-0.562	-0.129
Assists	3	1.65	1.47	0.19	0.919	0.175
Shots	7	4.1	2.93	0.09	0.988	0.089
Passes	22	18.39	7.15	0.08	0.504	0.04
Saves	1	2.14	2.23	0.19	-0.51	-0.097
Blocks	0	0.7	1	0.11	-0.695	-0.076
Takeaways	8	4.66	3.24	0.11	1.032	0.114

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.115 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.23, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.0

Pucker+100

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3.5	3.429	1.021	0.32	0.327
Shots	7	4.103	1.706	0.08	0.136
Saves	1	2.135	0.468	0.15	0.07
Blocks	0	0.697	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	8	4.658	1.717	0.12	0.206
Passes	22	18.394	1.196	0.08	0.096
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 0.85 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1 → ×100 = 100.01 → 100

Offensive5.63

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.045	0.079	0.4	1.755
Shooting %	0.143	0.48	0.2	0.715
Assists per pass	0.136	0.09	0.4	3.163

Σ contribution = 5.633

Defensive6.18

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.135	4.053	0.3	1.216
Blocks	0	0.697	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	8	4.658	8.461	0.25	2.115
Goals conceded	2	6.058	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.184

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

fueeqo Minneapolis Milk Duds

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.97	1.72	0.23	1.18	0.271
Assists	1	1.65	1.47	0.19	-0.444	-0.084
Shots	10	4.1	2.93	0.09	2.011	0.181
Passes	19	18.39	7.15	0.08	0.085	0.007
Saves	2	2.14	2.23	0.19	-0.061	-0.012
Blocks	0	0.7	1	0.11	-0.695	-0.076
Takeaways	9	4.66	3.24	0.11	1.341	0.147

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.434 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.868, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.4

Pucker+132

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.429	1.458	0.32	0.467
Shots	10	4.103	2.437	0.08	0.195
Saves	2	2.135	0.937	0.15	0.14
Blocks	0	0.697	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	9	4.658	1.932	0.12	0.232
Passes	19	18.394	1.033	0.08	0.083
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 1.157 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.361 − 0.044 turnover penalty = 1.317 → ×100 = 131.66 → 132

Offensive5.54

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.094	0.079	0.4	2.698
Shooting %	0.4	0.48	0.2	1.069
Assists per pass	0.053	0.09	0.4	1.773

Σ contribution = 5.54

Defensive6.81

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.135	5.747	0.3	1.724
Blocks	0	0.697	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	9	4.658	8.926	0.25	2.232
Goals conceded	2	6.058	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.809

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Graves Minneapolis Milk Duds

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.97	1.72	0.23	0.019	0.004
Assists	0	1.65	1.47	0.19	-1.126	-0.214
Shots	7	4.1	2.93	0.09	0.988	0.089
Passes	20	18.39	7.15	0.08	0.225	0.018
Saves	0	2.14	2.23	0.19	-0.959	-0.182
Blocks	0	0.7	1	0.11	-0.695	-0.076
Takeaways	11	4.66	3.24	0.11	1.958	0.215

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.146 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.708, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 5.2

Pucker+84

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.429	0.583	0.32	0.187
Shots	7	4.103	1.706	0.08	0.136
Saves	0	2.135	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.697	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	11	4.658	2.361	0.12	0.283
Passes	20	18.394	1.087	0.08	0.087
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.753 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.886 − 0.044 turnover penalty = 0.842 → ×100 = 84.24 → 84

Offensive3.57

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.029	0.079	0.4	1.496
Shooting %	0.286	0.48	0.2	0.893
Assists per pass	0	0.09	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.571

Defensive6.12

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.135	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.697	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	11	4.658	9.507	0.25	2.377
Goals conceded	2	6.058	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.116

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.