Cincinnati Banshees vs Massachusetts Manatees

CBHomeCincinnati Banshees

7–3Final

MMAwayMassachusetts Manatees

Aug 4, 2022 · Open Division - Benders · The Delirium Dome

MVP [CGX] Chino · 7.1 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Cincinnati BansheesvsMassachusetts Manatees

10Shots46

3Saves3

7Faceoffs won16

26Takeaways1313

13Turnovers↓1326

3Blocks3

69Passes2940

3:19Possession2:250:54

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Cincinnati Banshees

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[BANS] Forg	1	3	4	1	2	2	3	5	2	0	24	0:32	101	7.80	6.02
[CGX] Chino	5	1	6	5	1	2	1	8	3	0	25	1:05	138	5.81	5.98
[PTF] Brewski	1	2	3	4	0	3	2	13	8	3	20	1:42	112	4.94	7.50

Massachusetts Manatees

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[MAMA] Cosmo Kramer	1	0	1	3	2	2	2	4	8	0	13	0:21	53	3.82	4.96
[MAMA] Post Master	1	0	1	1	0	2	1	1	5	1	9	0:03	39	7.01	4.54
[MAMA] Skonchy	1	2	3	2	1	2	4	8	13	2	18	0:30	88	6.57	6.44

Forg Cincinnati Banshees

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.77	1.71	0.23	-0.449	-0.103
Assists	3	1.3	1.36	0.19	1.249	0.237
Shots	1	3.78	2.93	0.09	-0.948	-0.085
Passes	24	14.96	7.57	0.08	1.194	0.096
Saves	2	2.01	2.4	0.19	-0.006	-0.001
Blocks	0	0.74	0.92	0.11	-0.803	-0.088
Takeaways	5	5.69	4.38	0.11	-0.157	-0.017

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.037 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.075, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.3

Pucker+101

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	2.968	1.348	0.32	0.431
Shots	1	3.782	0.264	0.08	0.021
Saves	2	2.015	0.993	0.15	0.149
Blocks	0	0.738	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	5	5.687	0.879	0.12	0.106
Passes	24	14.956	1.605	0.08	0.128
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.859 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.011 → ×100 = 101.08 → 101

Offensive7.80

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.125	0.095	0.4	2.882
Shooting %	1	0.467	0.2	1.851
Assists per pass	0.125	0.087	0.4	3.062

Σ contribution = 7.796

Defensive6.02

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.015	5.971	0.3	1.791
Blocks	0	0.738	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	5	5.687	5.519	0.25	1.38
Goals conceded	3	6.024	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.024

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Chino Cincinnati Banshees

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	1.77	1.71	0.23	1.89	0.435
Assists	1	1.3	1.36	0.19	-0.219	-0.042
Shots	5	3.78	2.93	0.09	0.415	0.037
Passes	25	14.96	7.57	0.08	1.327	0.106
Saves	1	2.01	2.4	0.19	-0.422	-0.08
Blocks	0	0.74	0.92	0.11	-0.803	-0.088
Takeaways	8	5.69	4.38	0.11	0.528	0.058

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.426 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.852, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.1

Pucker+138

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	2.968	2.021	0.32	0.647
Shots	5	3.782	1.322	0.08	0.106
Saves	1	2.015	0.496	0.15	0.074
Blocks	0	0.738	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	8	5.687	1.407	0.12	0.169
Passes	25	14.956	1.672	0.08	0.134
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 1.17 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.376 → ×100 = 137.6 → 138

Offensive5.81

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.092	0.095	0.4	2.349
Shooting %	1	0.467	0.2	1.851
Assists per pass	0.04	0.087	0.4	1.612

Σ contribution = 5.813

Defensive5.98

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.015	4.14	0.3	1.242
Blocks	0	0.738	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	8	5.687	7.543	0.25	1.886
Goals conceded	3	6.024	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.981

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Brewski Cincinnati Banshees

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.77	1.71	0.23	-0.449	-0.103
Assists	2	1.3	1.36	0.19	0.515	0.098
Shots	4	3.78	2.93	0.09	0.074	0.007
Passes	20	14.96	7.57	0.08	0.666	0.053
Saves	0	2.01	2.4	0.19	-0.838	-0.159
Blocks	3	0.74	0.92	0.11	2.459	0.271
Takeaways	13	5.69	4.38	0.11	1.669	0.184

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.349 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.699, then +0.3 takeaways, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.5

Pucker+112

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	2.968	0.674	0.32	0.216
Shots	4	3.782	1.058	0.08	0.085
Saves	0	2.015	0	0.15	0
Blocks	3	0.738	4.063	0.07	0.284
Takeaways	13	5.687	2.286	0.12	0.274
Passes	20	14.956	1.337	0.08	0.107
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 1.002 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.179 − 0.061 turnover penalty = 1.118 → ×100 = 111.75 → 112

Offensive4.94

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.029	0.095	0.4	1.442
Shooting %	0.25	0.467	0.2	0.853
Assists per pass	0.1	0.087	0.4	2.641

Σ contribution = 4.936

Defensive7.50

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.015	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	3	0.738	9.983	0.2	1.997
Takeaways	13	5.687	9.432	0.25	2.358
Goals conceded	3	6.024	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 7.503

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Cosmo Kramer Massachusetts Manatees

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.77	1.71	0.23	-0.449	-0.103
Assists	0	1.3	1.36	0.19	-0.953	-0.181
Shots	3	3.78	2.93	0.09	-0.267	-0.024
Passes	13	14.96	7.57	0.08	-0.258	-0.021
Saves	2	2.01	2.4	0.19	-0.006	-0.001
Blocks	0	0.74	0.92	0.11	-0.803	-0.088
Takeaways	4	5.69	4.38	0.11	-0.385	-0.042

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.461 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.078, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 4.6

Pucker+53

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	2.968	0.337	0.32	0.108
Shots	3	3.782	0.793	0.08	0.063
Saves	2	2.015	0.993	0.15	0.149
Blocks	0	0.738	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	4	5.687	0.703	0.12	0.084
Passes	13	14.956	0.869	0.08	0.07
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.504 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.593 − 0.061 turnover penalty = 0.532 → ×100 = 53.19 → 53

Offensive3.82

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.048	0.095	0.4	1.66
Shooting %	0.333	0.467	0.2	0.977
Assists per pass	0	0.087	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.818

Defensive4.96

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.015	5.971	0.3	1.791
Blocks	0	0.738	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	4	5.687	4.847	0.25	1.212
Goals conceded	7	6.024	5.446	0.25	1.362

Σ contribution = 4.956

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Post Master Massachusetts Manatees

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.77	1.71	0.23	-0.449	-0.103
Assists	0	1.3	1.36	0.19	-0.953	-0.181
Shots	1	3.78	2.93	0.09	-0.948	-0.085
Passes	9	14.96	7.57	0.08	-0.787	-0.063
Saves	0	2.01	2.4	0.19	-0.838	-0.159
Blocks	1	0.74	0.92	0.11	0.284	0.031
Takeaways	1	5.69	4.38	0.11	-1.07	-0.118

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.678 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.644, then +0.25 hot shooting → 4.9

Pucker+39

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	2.968	0.337	0.32	0.108
Shots	1	3.782	0.264	0.08	0.021
Saves	0	2.015	0	0.15	0
Blocks	1	0.738	1.354	0.07	0.095
Takeaways	1	5.687	0.176	0.12	0.021
Passes	9	14.956	0.602	0.08	0.048
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.333 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.392 → ×100 = 39.18 → 39

Offensive7.01

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.333	0.095	0.4	3.978
Shooting %	1	0.467	0.2	1.851
Assists per pass	0	0.087	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 7.011

Defensive4.54

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.015	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	1	0.738	7.361	0.2	1.472
Takeaways	1	5.687	3.291	0.25	0.823
Goals conceded	7	6.024	5.446	0.25	1.362

Σ contribution = 4.543

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Skonchy Massachusetts Manatees

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.77	1.71	0.23	-0.449	-0.103
Assists	2	1.3	1.36	0.19	0.515	0.098
Shots	2	3.78	2.93	0.09	-0.608	-0.055
Passes	18	14.96	7.57	0.08	0.402	0.032
Saves	1	2.01	2.4	0.19	-0.422	-0.08
Blocks	2	0.74	0.92	0.11	1.372	0.151
Takeaways	8	5.69	4.38	0.11	0.528	0.058

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.101 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.202, then −0.3 turnovers → 5.9

Pucker+88

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	2.968	1.011	0.32	0.323
Shots	2	3.782	0.529	0.08	0.042
Saves	1	2.015	0.496	0.15	0.074
Blocks	2	0.738	2.709	0.07	0.19
Takeaways	8	5.687	1.407	0.12	0.169
Passes	18	14.956	1.204	0.08	0.096
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.915 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.076 − 0.193 turnover penalty = 0.883 → ×100 = 88.31 → 88

Offensive6.57

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.1	0.095	0.4	2.478
Shooting %	0.5	0.467	0.2	1.256
Assists per pass	0.111	0.087	0.4	2.837

Σ contribution = 6.571

Defensive6.44

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.015	4.14	0.3	1.242
Blocks	2	0.738	9.746	0.2	1.949
Takeaways	8	5.687	7.543	0.25	1.886
Goals conceded	7	6.024	5.446	0.25	1.362

Σ contribution = 6.439

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.