Churchill Polar Bears vs Edmonton Beauties - West

CPHomeChurchill Polar Bears

1–11Final

EBAwayEdmonton Beauties - West

Mar 11, 2022 · West Division · The Hog Hole

MVP fueeqo · 7.5 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Churchill Polar BearsvsEdmonton Beauties - West

1Shots1819

8Saves80

4Faceoffs won48

7Takeaways7

7Turnovers↓7

1Blocks10

13Passes1730

0:09Possession0:300:39

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Churchill Polar Bears

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
CHU Oil	0	0	0	0	2	0	4	5	3	1	5	0:05	50	2.95	6.11
CHU Smishy	1	0	1	1	2	0	2	0	0	0	5	0:00	37	4.12	4.38
damoni	0	1	1	0	4	4	2	2	4	0	3	0:04	62	8.33	5.47

Edmonton Beauties - West

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Rabbi Mekhail	2	2	4	6	0	1	1	2	9	0:10	68	8.50	4.57
fueeqo	6	2	8	8	2	3	3	4	12	0:10	121	8.62	4.84
Graves	3	3	5	5	6	0	3	1	9	0:19	94	9.17	4.84

CHU Oil Churchill Polar Bears

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.08	1.94	0.23	-1.077	-0.248
Assists	0	1.42	1.53	0.19	-0.932	-0.177
Shots	0	3.89	3.35	0.09	-1.163	-0.105
Passes	5	12.67	7.05	0.08	-1.088	-0.087
Saves	2	1.8	2.29	0.19	0.085	0.016
Blocks	1	0.64	0.97	0.11	0.371	0.041
Takeaways	5	5.23	4.38	0.11	-0.052	-0.006

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.565 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.87, then −0.2 goals against → 4.7

Pucker+50

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.441	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	3.892	0	0.08	0
Saves	2	1.804	1.109	0.15	0.166
Blocks	1	0.641	1.561	0.07	0.109
Takeaways	5	5.229	0.956	0.12	0.115
Passes	5	12.67	0.395	0.08	0.032
Faceoff win rate	0	0.501	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.422 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.496 → ×100 = 49.64 → 50

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.106	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.536	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.112	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive6.11

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	1.804	6.433	0.3	1.93
Blocks	1	0.641	8.036	0.2	1.607
Takeaways	5	5.229	5.825	0.25	1.456
Goals conceded	11	6.601	4.481	0.25	1.12

Σ contribution = 6.113

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

CHU Smishy Churchill Polar Bears

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.08	1.94	0.23	-0.56	-0.129
Assists	0	1.42	1.53	0.19	-0.932	-0.177
Shots	1	3.89	3.35	0.09	-0.864	-0.078
Passes	5	12.67	7.05	0.08	-1.088	-0.087
Saves	2	1.8	2.29	0.19	0.085	0.016
Blocks	0	0.64	0.97	0.11	-0.661	-0.073
Takeaways	0	5.23	4.38	0.11	-1.194	-0.131

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.659 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.683, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.7

Pucker+37

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.441	0.291	0.32	0.093
Shots	1	3.892	0.257	0.08	0.021
Saves	2	1.804	1.109	0.15	0.166
Blocks	0	0.641	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	5.229	0	0.12	0
Passes	5	12.67	0.395	0.08	0.032
Faceoff win rate	0	0.501	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.311 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.366 → ×100 = 36.64 → 37

Offensive4.12

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0	0.106	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	1	0.536	0.2	1.76
Assists per pass	0	0.112	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.123

Defensive4.38

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	1.804	6.433	0.3	1.93
Blocks	0	0.641	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	0	5.229	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	11	6.601	4.481	0.25	1.12

Σ contribution = 4.379

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

damoni Churchill Polar Bears

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.08	1.94	0.23	-1.077	-0.248
Assists	1	1.42	1.53	0.19	-0.278	-0.053
Shots	0	3.89	3.35	0.09	-1.163	-0.105
Passes	3	12.67	7.05	0.08	-1.372	-0.11
Saves	4	1.8	2.29	0.19	0.958	0.182
Blocks	0	0.64	0.97	0.11	-0.661	-0.073
Takeaways	2	5.23	4.38	0.11	-0.737	-0.081

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.487 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.027, then −0.2 goals against → 4.8

Pucker+62

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.441	0.291	0.32	0.093
Shots	0	3.892	0	0.08	0
Saves	4	1.804	2.217	0.15	0.333
Blocks	0	0.641	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	2	5.229	0.383	0.12	0.046
Passes	3	12.67	0.237	0.08	0.019
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.501	1.331	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.53 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.624 → ×100 = 62.4 → 62

Offensive8.33

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.25	0.106	0.4	3.801
Shooting %	0	0.536	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.333	0.112	0.4	3.938

Σ contribution = 8.33

Defensive5.47

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	1.804	9.356	0.3	2.807
Blocks	0	0.641	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	2	5.229	3.802	0.25	0.951
Goals conceded	11	6.601	4.481	0.25	1.12

Σ contribution = 5.469

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Rabbi Mekhail Edmonton Beauties - West

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.08	1.94	0.23	-0.044	-0.01
Assists	2	1.42	1.53	0.19	0.376	0.071
Shots	6	3.89	3.35	0.09	0.63	0.057
Passes	9	12.67	7.05	0.08	-0.521	-0.042
Saves	0	1.8	2.29	0.19	-0.787	-0.149
Blocks	0	0.64	0.97	0.11	-0.661	-0.073
Takeaways	1	5.23	4.38	0.11	-0.965	-0.106

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.252 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.496, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.3

Pucker+68

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.441	1.162	0.32	0.372
Shots	6	3.892	1.542	0.08	0.123
Saves	0	1.804	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.641	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	1	5.229	0.191	0.12	0.023
Passes	9	12.67	0.71	0.08	0.057
Faceoff win rate	0	0.501	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.575 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.677 → ×100 = 67.66 → 68

Offensive8.50

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.4	0.106	0.4	3.987
Shooting %	0.333	0.536	0.2	0.911
Assists per pass	0.222	0.112	0.4	3.602

Σ contribution = 8.501

Defensive4.57

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.804	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.641	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	1	5.229	3.324	0.25	0.831
Goals conceded	1	6.601	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 4.57

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

fueeqo Edmonton Beauties - West

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	6	2.08	1.94	0.23	2.022	0.465
Assists	2	1.42	1.53	0.19	0.376	0.071
Shots	8	3.89	3.35	0.09	1.227	0.11
Passes	12	12.67	7.05	0.08	-0.095	-0.008
Saves	0	1.8	2.29	0.19	-0.787	-0.149
Blocks	0	0.64	0.97	0.11	-0.661	-0.073
Takeaways	3	5.23	4.38	0.11	-0.509	-0.056

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.361 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.722, then +0.5 hat trick, +0.25 hot shooting → 7.5

Pucker+121

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7.5	3.441	2.179	0.32	0.697
Shots	8	3.892	2.055	0.08	0.164
Saves	0	1.804	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.641	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	3	5.229	0.574	0.12	0.069
Passes	12	12.67	0.947	0.08	0.076
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.501	0.798	0.03	0.024

Σ 1.03 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.212 → ×100 = 121.23 → 121

Offensive8.62

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.8	0.106	0.4	4
Shooting %	0.75	0.536	0.2	1.504
Assists per pass	0.167	0.112	0.4	3.117

Σ contribution = 8.621

Defensive4.84

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.804	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.641	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	3	5.229	4.391	0.25	1.098
Goals conceded	1	6.601	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 4.837

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Graves Edmonton Beauties - West

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.08	1.94	0.23	0.473	0.109
Assists	3	1.42	1.53	0.19	1.03	0.196
Shots	5	3.89	3.35	0.09	0.331	0.03
Passes	9	12.67	7.05	0.08	-0.521	-0.042
Saves	0	1.8	2.29	0.19	-0.787	-0.149
Blocks	0	0.64	0.97	0.11	-0.661	-0.073
Takeaways	3	5.23	4.38	0.11	-0.509	-0.056

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.014 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.029, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.3

Pucker+94

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5.5	3.441	1.598	0.32	0.511
Shots	5	3.892	1.285	0.08	0.103
Saves	0	1.804	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.641	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	3	5.229	0.574	0.12	0.069
Passes	9	12.67	0.71	0.08	0.057
Faceoff win rate	1	0.501	1.996	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.8 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.941 → ×100 = 94.09 → 94

Offensive9.17

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.316	0.106	0.4	3.94
Shooting %	0.6	0.536	0.2	1.296
Assists per pass	0.333	0.112	0.4	3.938

Σ contribution = 9.174

Defensive4.84

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.804	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.641	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	3	5.229	4.391	0.25	1.098
Goals conceded	1	6.601	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 4.837

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.